Table 2. Depicting Various Indications of Revision Using Direct Anterior Approach.
| No. | Study | Instability | Periprosthetic joint infection | Aseptic loosening | Paprosky classification | Vancouver classification | Dislocation | Psoas impringement | Periprosthetic fracture | Polyethylene wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hasler et al.6) | - | 17 (16 ML/1 FC) | 12 (7 AC/4 FC/1 Both) | NS | NS | 18 (5 ML/9 AC/2 FC/2 Both) | 5 (5 AC) | 7 (1 AC/6 FC) | 4 (4 AC) |
| 2 | Baba et al.15) | - | - | 22 AC | Type 2a 6, type 2b 4, type 2c 7, type 3a 4, type 3b 1 | NA | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | Bouveau et al.18) | 1 | - | 8 FC, 3 AC | NA | NA | - | - | 3 | - |
| 4 | Horsthemke et al.17) | - | - | 46 AC | Type 1 2, type 2a 14, type 2b 14, type 2c 1, type 3a 14, type 3b 3 | NA | 5 | 1 | - | - |
| 5 | Tamaki et al.16) | - | - | 11 AC | Type 2a 2, type 2c 1, type 3a 3, type 3b 5 | NA | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | Thaler et al.20) | - | 49 | NS | NA | - | - | - | - | |
| 7 | Thaler et al.21) | - | - | B2 – 36, type B3 – 4 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 8 | Ghijselings et al.11) | - | - | 1 Both | NS | Type A – 2, type B2 – 2 | - | - | 40 | - |
| 9 | Thaler et al.19) | - | - | 64 | Type 2b 11, type 2c 5, type 3a 18, type 3b 29, type 4 1 | NA | 0 | - | - | - |
ML: mobile liner, FC: femoral component, AC: acetabular component, NS: not specified, NA: not applicable.