Table 4. Discussing the Revision Procedure Performed for Revision Using Direct Anterior Approach in Included Studies.
| No. | Study | Head/liner change | Stem revision | Cup revision | Combined revision | Liner and head exchanges | Acetabular cup revisions | Femoral stem revisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hasler et al.6) | 21 | 13 | 26 | 3 | 21 | 26 | 13 |
| 2 | Baba et al.15) | 0 | 0 | 22 | 0 | - | Kerboull-type plate+allogeneic bone of the femoral head | - |
| 3 | Bouveau et al.18) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 16 Hips (13 CoC, 2 MoP, 1 MoM), 1 isolated femoral revision | - | - |
| 4 | Horsthemke et al.17) | 0 | 0 | 41 | 7 | 28 mm 1, 32 mm 7, 36 mm 15, dual mobility 25 |
Hemispherical press fit 23, cage with cemented dual mobility cup 13, cemented dual mobility with metal, augment/wedge (off-label) 5, dual mobility cemented 7 | Total=7 |
| 5 | Tamaki et al.16) | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 28 mm 5, 32 mm 6 |
Kerboull-type plate, allogenic femoral head bone grafts, cemented cup 44 mm – 2, cemented cup 48 mm – 8, cemented cup 52 mm – 1 | 5 and 7 (Engh's grade 2–3) |
| 6 | Thaler et al.20) | 0 | 49 | 0 | 0 | Custom-made spacer B/W 2 staged procedure | - | - |
| 7 | Thaler et al.21) | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 | - | Modular uncemented 21, modular cemented 4, long cemented 12, long uncemented 3 | |
| 8 | Ghijselings et al.11) | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | - | - | - |
| 9 | Thaler et al.19) | 0 | 0 | 42 | 22 | - | Graft augmentation prosthesis (GAP)-II, reconstruction cage | NS |
| Total | 21 | 107 | 100 | 27 | - | - | - | |
CoC: ceramic on ceramic, MoP: metal on polyethylene, MoM: metal on metal, B/W: between, NS: not specified.