Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 16;100(10):2443–2452. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04566-0

Table 2.

Treatment modalities according to the frontline and subsequent treatments for patients with SAA and VSAA

n = 280 Frontline treatment, n (%) Subsequent treatment, n (%)
rATG ± CsA* 143 (51.1) rATG ± CsA 20 (14.0)
Anabolic steroids 20 (14.0)
CsA-based 5 (3.5)
Anabolic steroids 102 (36.4) rATG ± CsA 9 (8.8)
CsA-based 1 (1.0)
CsA-based# 12 (4.3) rATG ± CsA 1 (8.3)
Anabolic steroids 1 (8.3)
No specific treatment 23 (8.2) -

Did not include 3 patients who underwent HSCT

*rATG ± CsA: rATG with or without CsA; rATG with CsA (n = 123); rATG without CsA (n = 20)

#CsA-based: CsA contained treatment without ATG

Subjects without subsequent treatment were not included

rATG, rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin; CsA, cyclosporin A