Table 4.
Coefficients of digestibility (means ± SEM) of the three isogenic lines (R23h, AB1h, and A22h) fed either the control marine resources-based diet ad libitum (M) or the complete plant-based diet (V).
| Dietary treatment | Genotype | Protein | Lipid | Starch | Energy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | R23h | 90.5 ± 0.2 | 96.4 ± 0.3b | 98.9 ± 0.0b | 90.2 ± 0.5b |
| AB1h | 91.4 ± 0.2 | 97.9 ± 0.1a | 99.5 ± 0.0a | 92.1 ± 0.1b | |
| A22h | 91.6 ± 0.1 | 97.4 ± 0.0a | 99.4 ± 0.0a | 91.9 ± 0.1b | |
| V | R23h | 96.8 ± 0.3 | 95.6 ± 0.2b | 92.8 ± 0.4d | 89.1 ± 0.3b |
| AB1h | 97.1 ± 0.0 | 96.0 ± 0.0b | 95.7 ± 0.3c | 89.2 ± 0.1b | |
| A22h | 97.2 ± 0.0 | 95.8 ± 0.0b | 96.6 ± 0.0c | 89.8 ± 0.4b | |
| STATISTICAL ANALYSIS | |||||
| Dietary treatment |
<0.001 (V>M) |
<0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Genotype |
<0.05
(AB1h = A22h > R23h) |
<0.001 | <0.001 | <0.01 | |
| Dietary treatment × Genotype | ns | <0.001 | <0.01 | <0.05 | |
Two-way analysis of variance, followed by a Tukey post-hoc test were carried out in order to assess effects of the dietary treatment and the genotype. Different letters mean significance between groups (Cut-off P < 0.05). Significant differences are in bold.