Table 4.
Hierarchical regression analysis summary for three dependent variables with Vineland covariate
| R2 | Δ R2 | ΔF | DF | β | SE β |
Prob β |
Part | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DV—phonemic score/trial set 2 | ||||||||
| Model 1 | .04 | .04 | .68 | (1,17) | ||||
| Vineland total SS | .20 | .69 | .422 | .20 | ||||
| Model 2 | .40 | .36 | 9.62** | (1,16) | ||||
| Vineland total SS | −.01 | .59 | .968 | −.01 | ||||
| Week 4 words passed/trial | .64 | .68 | .007 | .60 | ||||
| Model 3 | .62 | .22 | 8.92** | (1,15) | ||||
| Vineland total SS | −.09 | .49 | .622 | −.08 | ||||
| Week 4 words passed/trial | −.03 | .93 | .928 | −.02 | ||||
| Week 4 phonemic/trial | .84 | .92 | .009 | .47 | ||||
| DV—words passed/trial set 2 | ||||||||
| Model 1 | .07 | .07 | 1.36 | (1,17) | ||||
| Vineland total SS | .27 | .08 | .260 | .27 | ||||
| Model 2 | .47 | .40 | 11.94** | (1,16) | ||||
| Vineland total SS | .06 | .07 | .764 | .06 | ||||
| Week 4 words passed/trial | .66 | .08 | .003 | .63 | ||||
| Model 3 | .56 | .09 | 3.02 | (1,15) | ||||
| Vineland Total SS | .01 | .06 | .956 | .01 | ||||
| Week 4 words passed/trial | .25 | .12 | .420 | .14 | ||||
| Week 4 phonemic/trial | .53 | .12 | 103 | .30 | ||||
| DV—words passed/week all subsequent weeks | ||||||||
| Model 1 | .10 | .10 | 1.90 | (1,17) | ||||
| Vineland total SS | .32 | .56 | .186 | .32 | ||||
| Model 2 | .47 | .37 | 11.08** | (1,16) | ||||
| Vineland total SS | .11 | .47 | .573 | .11 | ||||
| Week 4 words passed/trial | .64 | .54 | .004 | .61 | ||||
| Model 2 | .76 | .30 | 18.73*** | (1,15) | ||||
| Vineland total SS | .02 | .33 | .867 | .02 | ||||
| Week 4 words passed/trial | −.12 | .62 | .601 | −.07 | ||||
| Week 4 phonemic/trial | .96 | .62 | .001 | .54 | ||||
*** = < .001, ** = < .01, * = < .05, ^ = < .10