Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 10;15:101128. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101128

Table 3.

Comparison of BMD measurements between groups during the 12-month study period.

Group Baseline 12 months p-Valuewg % change SP Adjusted 12 months
BMD L1-L4 Denosumab 1.002 ± 0.156a 1.060 ± 0.174 <0.005 5.76% ± 3.44b 1.125 ± 0.013a
Zoledronate 1.000 ± 0.140a 1.051 ± 0.138 0.001 5.43% ± 3.60b 1.120 ± 0.014a
Control 1.200 ± 0.166 1.162 ± 0.117 0.044 −2.58% ± 4.12 1.050 ± 0.013
p-Valuebg 0.003 0.112 <0.005 0.002
BMD FN Denosumab 0.748 ± 0.04b 0.771 ± 0.04b <0.005 3.01% ± 2.46 0.856 ± 0.010
Zoledronate 0.763 ± 0.04b 0.818 ± 0.06b 0.003 7.23% ± 5.46b, c 0.889 ± 0.011a
Control 0.963 ± 0.08 0.974 ± 0.09 0.063 1.22% ± 2.09 0.845 ± 0.013
p-Valuebg <0.005 <0.005 0.010 0.013

BMD: bone mineral density; bg: between group; wg: within group; SP: study period, baseline-12 months.

Adjusted for baseline measurements.

a

p < 0.05 vs. control.

b

p < 0.005 vs. control.

c

p < 0.05 vs. Denosumab.