Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 8;16:126–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.09.002

Table 2a.

Gastrointestinal helminth prevalence in foxes (Vulpes vulpes), coyotes (Canis latrans), and wolves (Canis lupus) observed by gross examination (N = 276) in Québec, Canada.

Foxes (N = 176)
Coyotes (N = 77)
Wolves (N = 23)
Difference in parasite prevalence among canid host species (N = 276)
N %d N %d N %d N %d Pe
Cestodesa 22 13 (8–18) 49 64 (52–73) 15 65 (45–81) 86 31 (26–37) <0.001
Diphyllobothriids (likely Dibothriocephalus spp.) 1 1 (0–3) 8 10 (5–19) 1 4 (1–21) 10 4 (2–6) <0.001
Echinococcus canadensisb 0 0 (0–2) 9 12 (6–21) 8 35 (19–55) 17 6 (4–9) <0.001
Taenia spp. 13 7 (4–12) 36 47 (36–58) 12 52 (33–71) 61 22 (18–27) <0.001
Nematodesa 79 45 (38–52) 5 7 (3–14) 0 0 (0–14) 84 30 (25–36) <0.001
Trematodesa 87 47 (40–54) 15 20 (12–30) 6 26 (13–46) 108 38 (33–44) <0.001
Alaria americana 68 37 (30–44) 15 20 (12–30) 6 26 (13–46) 89 31 (26–37) 0.008
Cryptocotyle lingua 26 14 (10–20) 0 0 (0–5) 0 0 (0–14) 26 9 (6–13) <0.001
Overall parasite prevalence after gross examinationc 134 76 (69–82) 53 69 (58–78) 17 74 (54–87) 204 74 (68–79) 0.46
a

Canids infected with at least one gastrointestinal helminth species from the helminth classes (cestodes, nematodes, trematodes) based on gross examination.

b

E. canadensis results already published and discussed in Schurer et al. (2018).

c

Canids infected with at least one gastrointestinal helminth species based on gross examination.

d

95% confidence intervals are displayed in parentheses.

e

P values are from Fisher's Exact test.