Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 8;16:126–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.09.002

Table 2b.

Comparison of Taenia spp. in foxes (Vulpes vulpes), coyotes (Canis latrans), and wolves (Canis lupus) based on molecular analyses (N = 65) following gross examination (N = 276) in Québec, Canada.

Foxes (N = 176)
Coyotes (N = 77)
Wolves (N = 23)
Difference in Taenia prevalence among canid host species (N = 276)
N %b N %b N %b N %b Pc
Taenia spp.
T. hydatigena, 0 0 (0–2) 5 6 (3–14) 3 13 (5–32) 8 3 (1–6) <0.001
T. twitchelli 5 3 (1–6) 2 3 (1–9) 3 13 (3–35) 10 4 (2–7) 0.08
T. crassiceps 4 2 (1–6) 1 1 (0–7) 0 0 (0–14) 5 2 (1–4) 1.0
T. polyacantha 3 2 (1–5) 0 0 (0–5) 0 0 (0–14) 3 1 (0–3) 0.66
T. krabbei 0 0 (0–2) 0 0 (0–5) 3 13 (5–32) 3 1 (0–3) <0.001
T. pisiformis-“like” 0 0 (0–2) 21 27 (19–38) 2 9 (2–27) 23 8 (6–12) <0.001
Unidentified 1 1 (0–3) 11 14 (8–24) 1 4 (1–21) 13 5 (3–8) <0.001
Overall Taenia prevalence after gross examinationa 13 7 (4–12) 36 47 (36–58) 12 52 (33–71) 61 22 (18–27) <0.001
a

Canids infected with at least one Taenia species based on gross examination.

b

95% confidence intervals are displayed in parentheses.

c

P values are from Fisher's Exact test.