Table 3.
Subarctic |
Humid Continental |
Difference in parasite prevalence between regions (only foxes, N = 155) |
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foxes = 74 |
Foxes = 81 |
Coyotes = 73 |
Wolves = 22 |
Difference in parasite prevalence among canid host species in the Humid Continental climate (N = 176) |
||||||||||||||
N | %b | Ia | N | %b | Ia | N | %b | Ia | N | %b | Ia | N | %b | P | N | %b | P | |
Cestodes | ||||||||||||||||||
Diphyllobothriids (likely Dibothriocephalus spp.)c | 4 | 5 (2–13) | 1+ to 2+ | 1 | 1 (0–7) | 1+ | 8 | 11 (6–20) | 1+ | 1 | 5 (1–22) | 0 | 10 | 6 (3–10) | 0.02 | 5 | 3 (1–7) | 0.19 |
Taeniid (Echinococcus spp. and/or Taenia spp.) | 2 | 3 (1–9) | 1+ | 11 | 14 (8–23) | 0 | 37 | 51 (39–62) | 1+ to 2+ | 14 | 64 (43–80) | 1+ | 62 | 35 (29–43) | <0.001 | 13 | 8 (5–14) | 0.02 |
Nematodes | ||||||||||||||||||
Capillaria spp. | 0 | 0 (0–5) | 1+ | 1 | 1 (0–7) | 1+ | 0 | 0 (0–5) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0–15) | 0 | 1 | 1 (0–3) | 1.0 | 1 | 1 (0–4) | 1.0 |
Toxascaris leonina | 41 | 55 (44–66) | 1+ to 4+ | 10 | 12 (7–21) | 1+ to 4+ | 3 | 4 (1–11) | 1+ | 1 | 5 (1–22) | 1+ | 14 | 8 (5–13) | 0.14 | 51 | 33 (26–41) | <0.001 |
Toxocara canis | 2 | 3 (1–9) | 1+ | 15 | 19 (12–28) | 1+ to 2+ | 2 | 3 (1–10) | 1+ to 2+ | 0 | 0 (0–15) | 0 | 17 | 10 (6–15) | <0.001 | 17 | 11 (7–17) | 0.002 |
Trichuris sp. | 16 | 22 (14–32) | 1+ to 3+ | 33 | 41 (31–52) | 1+ to 2+ | 6 | 8 (4–17) | 1+ | 2 | 9 (3–28) | 1+ | 41 | 23 (18–30) | <0.001 | 49 | 32 (25–39) | 0.02 |
Uncinaria sp. | 7 | 10 (5–18) | 0 | 5 | 6 (3–14) | 1+ | 3 | 4 (1–11) | 1+ to 2+ | 1 | 5 (1–22) | 1+ | 9 | 5 (3–9) | 0.89 | 12 | 8 (5–13) | 0.55 |
Trematodes | ||||||||||||||||||
Alaria americana | 29 | 39 (29–51) | 1+ to 2+ | 42 | 52 (41–62) | 1+ to 3+ | 18 | 25 (16–36) | 1+ | 7 | 32 (16–53) | 1+ | 67 | 38 (31–45) | 0.002 | 71 | 46 (38–54) | 0.15 |
Cryptocotyle lingua | 24 | 32 (23–44) | 0 | 2 | 3 (1–9) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0–5) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0–15) | 0 | 2 | 1 (0–4) | 0.62 | 26 | 17 (12–23) | <0.001 |
Metorchis sp. | 1 | 1 (0–7) | 1+ | 0 | 0 (0–5) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0–5) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0–15) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0–2) | 1.0 | 1 | 1 (0–4) | 0.48 |
Overall parasite prevalence after fecal flotationd | 57 | 77 (66–86) | - | 53 | 65 (54–75) | - | 22 | 30 (20–42) | - | 6 | 27 (12–50) | - | 81 | 46 (39–54) | <0.001 | 110 | 71 (63–78) | 0.16 |
Overall parasite prevalence combining gross examination/fecal flotationd | 67 | 91 (82–95) | - | 71 | 88 (79–93) | - | 53 | 73 (61–82) | - | 16 | 73 (52–87) | - | 140 | 80 (73–85) | 0.05 | 138 | 89 (83–93) | 0.62 |
Fecal infection intensity: 1+ 1–50 eggs per gram of feces (epg)/2 + 51–250/3 + 251–1000/4+ >1000.
95% confidence intervals are displayed in parentheses.
Most likely D. latus (previously Diphyllobothrium latum) or D. dendriticus (previously Diphyllobothrium dendriticum).
Canids infected with at least one gastrointestinal helminth species observed by fecal flotation, or combining gross examination and fecal flotation.