Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 20;20(9):e13452. doi: 10.1111/acel.13452

TABLE 4.

Mouse epigenetic clocks

Clock Number of CpGs Correlation (R 2) Generation of error estimate (Type of validation data set) Number of samples in training data Method used to find age‐associated CpGs Age range of training samples (Months) Cell types/Tissue used for training Reference
Wang 107 0.91 Independent validation data set 148 Elastic net 0.2–26 Liver Wang et al. (2017)
Petkovich 90 >0.90 Independent validation data set 141 Elastic net 3–35 Partial blood Petkovich et al. (2017)
Stubbs Multi‐Tissue 329 0.7 Training data sets partitioned and mixed with two external data sets to make up validation data set 129 Elastic net 0.2–9.5 Liver, lung, heart, muscle, spleen, cerebellum, cortex Stubbs et al. (2017)
Meer 435 0.89 Random segregation of validation data set from training ~333 Elastic net 0.2–35 Blood, heart, cortex, liver, lung, muscle, spleen, cerebellum, pro B cells, follicular B cells Meer et al. (2018)
Thompson All CpGs (Ridge) 582 0.79 Leave‐one‐batch‐out 893 Ridge Regression 0–30 Various tissues including adipose, blood, kidney, liver, lung, muscle, spleen Thompson et al. (2018)
Thompson All CpGs (Elastic Net) 582 0.82 Leave‐one‐batch‐out 893 Elastic net 0–30 "" Thompson et al. (2018)
Thompson Conserved CpGs (Ridge) 273 0.64 Leave‐one‐batch‐out 893 Ridge Regression 0–30 "" Thompson et al. (2018)
Thompson Conserved CpGs (Elastic Net) 273 0.68 Leave‐one‐batch‐out 893 Elastic net 0–30 "" Thompson et al. (2018)
Wood Mouse Clock 9 0.88 Same data set used for training 48 LASSO 3–16 Ear punch samples Little et al. (2020)

All clocks were trained on mouse RRBS data (with the exception of Wang et al., which used both RRBS and WGBS, and the Wood Mouse Clock, which used a targeted PCR approach combined with Oxford Nanopore).