Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 19;9(9):4780–4792. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2379

TABLE 2.

Characteristic of Included Studies for Subgroup analysis

Study Country Group Age Measuring methods Gender Recruitment

Diagnostic

criteria

Index
F M
Schweiger Germany No depression 60(12) Single energy quantitative CT 27 30 Clinical samples DSM‐III‐R BMD
Depression 60.5(10.5) 53 27
Michelson USA No depression 41(7) Dual‐energy X‐ray 24 0 Clinical samples DSM‐III‐R BMD
Depression 41(8) 24 0
Amsterdam USA No depression 37.8(3.6) Dual‐energy X‐ray 3 2 Clinical samples DSM‐III‐R BMD
Depression 41.3(12.8) 4 2
Reginster Belgium No depression —— Dual‐energy X‐ray 12 0 Population based Self‐rating (GHQ−28) BMD
Depression —— 12 0
Whooley USA No depression 73.3(5.1) Dual‐energy X‐ray Population based Self‐rating (GDS) BMD
Depression 74.5(5.3)
Schweiger Germany No depression 64(10) Single energy quantitative CT 7 14 Clinical samples DSM‐III‐R BMD
Depression 59(11) 8 10
Robbins USA No depression 74.21 (4.61) Dual‐energy X‐ray Population based Self‐rating (CES‐Dm) BMD
Depression 74.87 (5.56)
Kavunco Turkey No depression 36.7(6.7) Dual‐energy X‐ray 42 0 Clinical samples DSM‐IV BMD
Depression 35.4(7.5) 42 0
Yazıcı Turkey No depression 31.2(7.9) Dual‐energy X‐ray 15 0 Clinical samples DSM‐IV BMD
Depression 30.8(8.4) 25 0
Mussolino USA No depression 29.8 Dual‐energy X‐ray Population based Self‐rating (DIS) BMD
Depression 30.3
Whooley USA No depression 66.7 ( 7.5) Dual‐energy X‐ray 0 16 Population based Self‐rating (GDS) BMD
Depression 64.6 ( 8.6) 0 497
Ozsoy Turkey no depression 33.73 ± 7.16 Dual‐energy X‐ray 12 11 Clinical samples DSM‐IV BMD, Z‐score, T‐score
depression 37.57 ± 8.70 21 21
Sogaard Norway no depression 40.5 Dual‐energy X‐ray 1,437 Population based Self‐‐rating (custom) BMD
depression 40.7 343
Wong Hongkong no depression 72.34 ± 4.96 Dual‐energy X‐ray 0 1,830 Population based Self‐rating (GDS) BMD
depression 72.94 ± 5.41 0 169
Yazıcı Turkey no depression 46.2 ± 4.2 Dual‐energy X‐ray 30 0 Clinical samples DSM‐IV BMD, T‐score
depression 44.8 ± 5.4 35 0
Kahl Germany no depression 18–43 Dual‐energy X‐ray 16 0 Clinical samples DSM‐IV BMD, T‐score
depression 20–51 23 0
Altindag Turkey no depression 42.8 (5.3 ) Dual‐energy X‐ray 41 0 Clinical samples DSM‐IV BMD
depression 39.8 (8.8) 36 0
Diem USA no depression 75.6 ± 4.1 Dual‐energy X‐ray 3,977 0 Population based Self‐rating (GDS) BMD
depression 76.7 ± 4.3 200 0
Eskandari USA no depression 35 ± 6.8 Dual‐energy X‐ray 44 0 Clinical samples DSM‐IV BMD
depression 35 ± 6.9 89 0
Petronijević Serbia no depression 40.5 ± 5.7 Dual‐energy X‐ray 47 0 Clinical samples DSM‐IV BMD
depression 40.7 ± 4.6 73 0
Mezuk USA no depression —— Dual‐energy X‐ray 55 28 Population based Self‐rating(DIS) BMD
depression —— 7 3
Williams Australia no depression 66.0 Dual‐energy X‐ray Population based Self‐rating BMD
depression 65.0
Atteritano Italy no depression 53.36 ± 2.47 Dual‐energy X‐ray 50 0 Clinical samples DSM‐IV BMD, Z‐score, T‐score
depression 53.63 ± 1.93 50 0
Fazeli USA no depression <17 Dual‐energy X‐ray 16 16 Clinical samples DSM‐IV BMD, Z‐score
depression <17 17 16
Calarge USA no depression 19.1(1.4) Dual‐energy X‐ray 43 29 Clinical samples DSM‐IV BMD, Z‐score
depression 19.1(1.4) 110 40
Rauma Finland no depression 60.9 Dual‐energy X‐ray 0 794 Population based Self‐rating BMD
depression 53.5 0 144