Figure 3.
Small-study effects in meta-analyses across medical specialties. (A) Distribution of p values from regression-based tests, p<0.05 (one sided) were considered as evidence for small-study effects in meta-analyses (red). (B) Prevalence (with 95% CI) of small-study effects across the medical specialties. (C) Regression estimates (with 95% CI) for small-study effects with the outcome t-scores from regression-based tests. (D) Same but for a binary outcome (small-study effects yes/no). (E) Distribution of intercepts (magnitude of small-study effects) from regression-based test. (F) Number of systematic reviews affected by bias. ENT, ear, nose and throat. SJR, Scimago journal rank. n.s., not statistically significant.