Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 24;15(5):1111–1120. doi: 10.1177/1932296820950688

Table 4.

HbA1c and CGM Data in 28 Participants with Type 1 Diabetes.

Metric Baseline
Intervention week 1
Intervention week 12
N Mean (±SD) Mean (±SD) Mean change [CI]a P-valueb Mean (±SD) Mean change [CI]a P-valueb
HbA1c (mmol/mol) 28 57 (8) NA 57 (9) −0.6 [–2.6; 1.3] .510
(DCCT %) 28 7.4 (0.7) NA 7.3 (0.8) −0.1 [–0.2; 0.1] .510
CGM (MBG, mg/dL) 20 175 (29) 168 (24) −6.2 [–15.6; 3.1] .180 180 (26) 5.9 [–3.3; 15] .195
CGM (CV, %) 20 38.8 (8.9) 36.7 (9.6) −2.1 [–5.7; 1.6] .249 35.9 (7.6) −2.9 [–5.3; –0.4] .024
CGM (TIR, %) 20 53.9 (16.9) 57.3 (16.5) 3.4 [–2.2; 9.1] .220 50.1 (13.6) −3.8 [–10.0; 2.4] .214
CGM (TBR level 1, %) 20 2.2 (2.8) 2.6 (3.0) 0.4 [–0.9; 1.6] .556 2.2 (2.9) 0.0 [–0.9; 0.9] .986
CGM (TBR level 2, %) 20 1.7 (4.6) 1.8 (5.5) 0.0 [–0.6; 0.6] .914 1.0 (2.8) −0.7 [–1.7; 0.3] .154
CGM (TAR level 1, %) 20 25.9 (10.4) 26.8 (10.0) 0.9 [–1.7; 3.5] .476 31.4 (9.8) 5.6 [1.8; 9.3] .006
CGM (TAR level 2, %) 20 16.3 (11.4) 11.6 (8.1) −4.7 [–10.0; 0.5] .076 15.2 (9.5) −1.0 [–5.8; 3.8] .646

SD, standard deviation.

Baseline, 1-week, and 12-week results are reported.

a

95% confidence interval, paired z test, compared with baseline.

b

Paired z test, compared with baseline.

HbA1c results are only available for baseline and 12 weeks. CGM data only reported for participants, where sensor data were available for baseline, week 1, and 12 of the intervention.

CGM, continuous glucose monitoring; CV, coefficient of variation; DCCT, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial units, HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; MBG, mean blood glucose; TAR, time above range; TBR, time below range; TIR, time in range.