Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 15;22:185. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01536-3

Table 2.

Comparison of antibiotic prescribing outcomes in intervention and control clinics for main infections combineda

Arm N Crude Rate Unadjusted GEE Estimate Adjusted GEE Estimatec
OR (95% CIb) P OR (95% CI) p
Total Antibiotic Prescriptions
Control 763 325 (42.6%)
Intervention 609 297 (48.8%) 1.72 (1, 2.98) 0.05 0.78 (0.64, 0.96) 0.02
Delayed Antibiotic Prescriptions
Control 324d 38 (11.7%)
Intervention 294 65 (22.1%) 1.13 (0.47, 2.68) 0.79 2.29 (1.37, 3.83) <0.01
Prescription Duration Longer than 7 Dayse
Control 273 80 (29.3%)
Intervention 258 55 (21.3%) 0.34 (0.12, 1.01) 0.05 0.24 (0.13, 0.43) <0.0001
First Line Antibiotic Choicef
Control 232 197 (84.9%)
Intervention 258 238 (92.2%) 2.2 (2.02, 2.4) <0.0001 1.41 (0.66, 3.01) 0.37

aURI, sore throat, acute sinusitis, acute bronchitis, acute cystitisb 95% confidence interval; cadjusted for case-mix of conditions, age, sex, afterhours visits, and baseline prescribing rate; d denominators differ from total prescriptions in some cases due to missing data; e sore throat cases excluded from analysis fexcluding URI and bronchitis where any antibiotic is considered inappropriate