Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 3;7(36):eabg3788. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg3788

Table 1. Data retention performance comparison of the state-of-the-art organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite-based devices.

RT, room temperature.

Device structure ON/OFF ratio Retention time (s) Reading voltage (V) Report time (year) Reference
ITO/MAPbI3-XCIX/2D
perovskite/AI
>103 104/RT 0.25 2020 (19)
AI/RbPbBr3/ITO/
polyethylene
~106 104/RT 0.4 2020 (20)
Au/PMMA/CsSnI3/Pt >103 3 × 103/RT 0.02 2019 (21)
Au/CH3NH3PbI3/Au ~108 104/RT 0.05 2019 (22)
ITO/Cs2AgBiBr6/Au ~104 105/RT −1 2019 (23)
Au/(CH3NH3)3Bi2I9/ITO >104 103/RT 0.20 2018 (24)
Ag/PMMA/CsPBr3 QDs/
PMMA/ITO/PET
~105 4 × 105/RT 0.50 2018 (25)
Ag/CH3NH3PbI3/Pt >106 1.1 × 104/RT 2016 (26)
Au/CH3NH3PbI3-XCIX/FTO >102 104/RT 0.25 2015 (27)
Ag/MAPbCI3
monocrystalline
NWs/AI
~107 >107/RT 0.01 This work
Ag/MAPbCI3
monocrystalline
NWs/AI
~107 ~9 × 108/RT * 0.01 This work
Ag/MAPbCI3
monocrystalline
NWs/AI
~107 >7 × 105/85 °∁ 0.01 This work
Ag/MAPbCI3
polycrystalline
NWs/AI
~107 ~7 × 109/RT * 0.01 This work
Ag/MAPbCI3
polycrystalline
NWs/AI
~107 >6 × 105/105°∁ 0.01 This work

*Retention time value is extrapolated from Arrhenius relation [In (t) ∝ Ea/kT]. Value without “*” is measured from real-time measurement.