Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Mar 30;77(12):1503–1516. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.01.050

Table 3.

T1 and T2 mapping values in comparison to reference ranges and also dichotomized based on those with and without MACE. Data are presented a z-scores and for specific MRI magnets and field strength

ICI myocarditis patients Reference Ranges p* MACE No MACE p
T1 z-score (n=86) 2.9 ± 1.9 - - 4.2 ± 1.0 2.3 ± 1.9 <0.001
T1 value - 1.5T Siemens (n=67) 1079.0±55.5 1000.3±22.1 <0.001 1114.7±40.9 1061.6±53.6 <0.001
T1 value - 1.5T Philips (n=4) 1014.0±34.0 961.5±23.0 0.007 1013 ± 0 1014.3 ± 41.6 N/A
T1 value - 3.0T Siemens (n=15) 1239.3±72.1 1097.3±144.6 <0.001 1244.0±64.0 1237.5±77.7 0.88
T2 z-score (n=79) 2.2 ± 2.1 - - 3.2 ± 2.4 1.8 ± 1.7 0.003
T2 value - 1.5T Siemens (n=67) 56.2±4.9 49.8±2.2 <0.001 57.9±6.5 55.4±3.7 0.045
T2 value - 1.5T Philips (n=4) 55.0±4.1 51.9±0.6 0.28 54.0±0 55.3 ± 4.9 N/A
T2 value - 3.0T Siemens (n=8) 42.9±4.6 39.3±0.1 0.063 46.0±0 42.4±4.8 N/A
*

Student’s t-test comparing T1 or T2 values of patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor associated myocarditis with site- and magnet-specific normal mean values and standard deviation.

Student’s t-test comparing T1 or T2 values of patients with and without major adverse cardiovascular events.

analysis could not be performed due only one patient in the MACE group.