Table 3.
Up and downregulated (a) PMs and (b) SMs in shoots and roots of plants inoculated with R. irregularis after 1 week of growth in the S-H cultivation system (Exp. 1).
| Peak | Proposed phytochemicals |
R
t
(min) |
Precursor Ion - [M-H]− | m/z calcd. | Δm (ppm) | MS/MS Fragment ions (m/z) | Chemical formula | Distribution a | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S and R metabolites contentb | (a) Primary metabolism | 1 | Asparagine | 1.44 | 131.0453 | 132.0529 | −7.3 | 131, 115, 88, 71 | C4H8N2O3 | S (5.19), R (6.56)↑ | Zengin et al., 2018 |
| 2 | L-Aspartic acid | 1.46 | 132.0294 | 133.0370 | −6.6 | 132, 115, 88, 71 | C4H7NO4 | S (2.19), R (6.29)↑ | Brieudes et al., 2016 | ||
| 3 | Glutamic acid | 1.44 | 146.0451 | 147.0526 | −5.3 | 146, 128, 102 | C5H8NO4 | S (5.31), R (6.54)↑ | Brieudes et al., 2016 | ||
| 4 | Gluconic acid | 1.49 | 195.0505 | 196.0578 | −2.6 | 177, 160, 129, 87, 75 | C6H12O7 | S (1.96)↑ | Brieudes et al., 2016 | ||
| 5 | L-Threonic acid | 1.54 | 135.0290 | 136.0366 | −6.8 | 135, 117, 89, 75, 61 | C4H8O5 | S (6.61), R (3.77)↑ | Brieudes et al., 2016 | ||
| 6 | DL-Malic acid | 1.59 | 133.0134 | 134.0210 | −6.6 | 133, 115, 89, 72, 71 | C4H6O5 | S (8.17), R (7.79)↑ | Li et al., 2004 | ||
| 7 | DL-pyroglutamic acid | 1.65 | 128.0344 | 129.0420 | −7.1 | 128, 82, 62 | C5H7NO3 | S (9.24), R (8.39)↑ | Shi et al., 2020 | ||
| 8 | N-Acetylalanine | 2.14 | 130.0501 | 131.0577 | −6.7 | 130, 88 | C5H9NO3 | R (4.25)↑ | – | ||
| 9 | Methylpyroglutamate | 2.23 | 142.0502 | 143.0577 | −5.5 | 142, 100, 98, 58 | C6H9NO3 | R (7.11)↑ | – | ||
| 10 | Phenylacetic acid | 3.65 | 135.0443 | 136.0519 | −6.2 | 93, 72 | C8H8O2 | R (5.28)↑ | Lee et al., 2017 | ||
| (b) Secondary metabolism | 11 | Syringic acid | 3.71 | 197.0453 | 198.0523 | −1.3 | 179, 151, 135, 123, 72 | C9H10O5 | R (4.55)↑ | Taamalli et al., 2015 | |
| 12 | p-Hydroxybenzoic acid | 5.03 | 137.0236 | 138.0311 | −6.3 | 135, 93, 65 | C7H6O3 | R (6.90)↑ | Gómez-García et al., 2021 | ||
| 13 | Chorismic acid | 5.24 | 225.0404 | 226.0472 | −0.9 | 207, 179, 137, 109, 61 | C10H10O6 | R (2.70)↑ | Khera et al., 2017 | ||
| 14 | Caffeic acid | 5.39 | 179.0344 | 180.0417 | −3.3 | 135, 109, 89, 73 | C9H8O4 | S (2.11)↑ | Gómez-García et al., 2021 | ||
| 15 | Methyl syringinoside | 5.25 | 547.2039 | 548.2099 | 1.3 | 191, 176, 161, 121, 93, 71 | C24H36O14 | R (1.54)↑ | Srinroch et al., 2020 | ||
| 16 | Lithospermic acid | 5.81 | 537.1050 | 538.1106 | 2.11 | 339, 295, 269, 197, 179, 161, 135, 109, 73 | C27H22O12 | S (2.28), R (3.07)↓ | Liu et al., 2007 | ||
| 17 | Anchusoside-9 | 6.07 | 827.4449 | 828.4502 | 1.8 | 665, 503, 161, 113, 85, 71 | C42H68O16 | S (2.25)↑ | Romussi et al., 1984 | ||
| 18 | Methyl syringin | 6.40 | 385.1510 | 386.1571 | 1.5 | 223, 191, 176, 161, 121, 93, 71 | C18H26O9 | R (1.52)↑ | Park et al., 2017 | ||
| 19 | Rosmarinic acid (RA) | 6.55 | 359.0777 | 360.0840 | 1.1 | 197, 179, 161, 135, 123, 73, 62 | C18H16O8 | R (2.11)↑ | Krzyzanowska-Kowalczyk et al., 2018 | ||
| 20 | Salvianolic acid C | 6.86 | 491.0992 | 492.1051 | 1.6 | 311, 267, 197, 185, 179, 135, 109, 73 | C26H20O10 | S (5.71)↑ | Finimundy et al., 2020 | ||
| 21 | Syringin | 6.89 | 371.1353 | 372.1415 | 1.3 | 176, 161, 121 | C17H24O9 | S (2.04)↑ | Filipek et al., 2019 | ||
| 22 | Ferulic acid | 7.04 | 193.0502 | 194.0574 | −2.2 | 179, 161, 133 | C10H10O4 | S (3.33), R (2.22)↑ | Gómez-García et al., 2021 | ||
| 23 | Methyl lithospermic acid | 7.11 | 551.1202 | 552.1262 | 1.5 | 339, 321, 293, 231, 185, 179, 161, 135, 109, 73 | C28H24O12 | R (2.79)↑ | Liu et al., 2007 | ||
| 24 | Dehydro SA B | 7.12 | 715.1324 | 716.1372 | 2.7 | 357, 339, 295, 185, 135, 109, 72 | C36H28O16 | S (4.31), R (4.47)↑ | Li et al., 2018 | ||
| 25 | Methyl rosmarinic acid | 7.17 | 373.0934 | 374.0996 | 1.5 | 197, 179, 160, 135, 123, 73 | C19H18O8 | S (1.99)↑ | Krzyzanowska-Kowalczyk et al., 2018 | ||
| 26 | 8-hydroxy-9”-methyl dehydro SA B | 7.24 | 745.1430 | 746.1478 | 2.7 | 467, 387, 339, 295, 193, 185, 151, 133, 109, 73 | C37H30O17 | R (7.17)↑ | Liu et al., 2007 | ||
| 27 | 8-hydroxy-9”-methyl SA B | 7.34 | 747.1588 | 748.1634 | 2.6 | 467, 389, 339, 295, 195, 185, 151, 135, 109, 73 | C37H32O17 | R (3.41)↑ | Liu et al., 2007 | ||
| 28 | Salvianolic acid B (SA B) | 7.47 | 717.1479 | 718.1528 | 2.2 | 357, 339, 321, 295, 265, 197, 185, 161, 135, 109, 73 | C36H30O16 | R (3.72)↑ | Wu et al., 2006 | ||
| 29 | 8-hydroxy-9'-methyl dehydroRA | 7.50 | 387.0731 | 388.0789 | 2.4 | 207, 179, 135, 121, 109 | C19H16O9 | R (4.54)↑ | Grzegorczyk-Karolak et al., 2019 | ||
| 30 | Isobavachalcone hexoside | 7.92 | 485.1827 | 486.1884 | 2.0 | 177, 163, 145, 117 | C26H30O9 | R (5.58)↑ | Cioffi et al., 2003 | ||
| 31 | Salvianolic acid F | 7.93 | 313.0723 | 314.0793 | 1.6 | 203, 179, 161, 133, 123 | C17H14O6 | S (2.48)↑ | Grzegorczyk-Karolak et al., 2019 | ||
| 32 | Oleanolic acid triglycoside | 8.06 | 939.3993 | 940.5026 | 3.6 | 808, 617, 455, 159, 129, 111, 87, 71 | C48H78O18 | S (2.26)↑ | - | ||
| 33 | Anchusoside-1 | 8.44 | 779.4612 | 780.4654 | 3.1 | 617, 455, 141, 112, 71 | C43H70O15 | S (1.73)↑ | Romussi et al., 1979 | ||
| 34 | Anchusoside-2 | 9.25 | 941.5106 | 942.5183 | −0.9 | 779, 617, 455, 161, 113, 85, 71 | C48H78O18 | S (1.91)↑ | Romussi et al., 1979 | ||
| NSc | 35 | Scoparone | 6.25 | 205.0497 | 206.0574 | −4.4 | 177, 161, 143, 133, 119 | C11H10O4 | NS (3.21)↑ | Wang et al., 2007 | |
| 36 | Byakangelicin | 10.89 | 333.0976 | 334.1047 | −1.0 | 303, 249, 202, 147, 131, 125 | C17H18O7 | NS (9.5)↑ | Zhang et al., 2009 |
Upregulated SMs (exudates) in nutrients solutions (NS) of M plant after 4 weeks (T4) of growth in the S-H cultivation system.
Numbers with a parenthesis represent the fold change of each compound in “M vs. NM” plants and corresponding nutrient solutions. Green arrows indicate the upregulation while red arrows the downregulation in shoot (S), roots (R), and/or nutrient solutions (NS) of M plants.
PMs and SMs affected by the AMF-plant symbiosis in shoot and root parts of the S-H cultivation system at T1 of the experiment.
SMs affected by the AMF-plant symbiosis in nutrient solutions (exudates) of the S-H cultivation system at T4 of the experiment.
Rt, retention time; Δm, mass errors; [M-H]-, m/z of the pseudomolecular ion in negative and positive ionization modes, respectively; m/z calcd, theoretical m/z value.