Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 10.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Biol. 2021 Mar 2;31(9):1977–1987.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.103

Figure 1. Experimental design, analytic workflow, and auditory-responsive ROIs.

Figure 1.

(A) Schematic of the imaging and experimental setup used to observe brain activity from zebrafish larvae, showing the mini-speaker attached to the back coverslip of the chamber. (B) Summary of the analysis workflow used to identify and categorize auditory-responsive neurons across the brain. (C, top) shows a schematic of the stimulus train used, including stimuli with a range of different forms, frequencies, and amplitudes. (C, bottom) shows the mean response of all the auditory-responsive ROIs in the resulting dataset. (D and E) All auditory-responsive ROIs across the brain are shown with the strength of the response represented by the color, and the correlation to the linear regression model (r2 value) represented as the size of the sphere. The strength of the response is between 2 (the threshold for inclusion) and 12SD. Brain regions containing a high proportion of auditory-responsive ROIs are identified spatially (Inset, D). Tel: telencephalon, Th: thalamus, Tec: tectum, TS: torus semicircularis, Teg: tegmentum, Cb: cerebellum, ON: octavolateralis nucleus, HB: remaining hindbrain. R, rostral; C, caudal; D, dorsal, V, ventral here and in subsequent figures. Scale bar applies to both D and E.