Skip to main content
The World Journal of Men's Health logoLink to The World Journal of Men's Health
letter
. 2020 Apr 8;39(4):818–819. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.200023

Letter to the Editor: How Can We Predict a Successful Outcome after Varicocelectomy in Painful Varicocele Patients? An Updated Meta-Analysis

Yu Seob Shin 1, Dong Sup Lee 2,
PMCID: PMC8443995  PMID: 32378367

Varicocelectomy has been recommended as an alternative for varicocele patients who are refractory to conservative treatments. However, some patients experienced testicular pain even after surgery [1]. To the best of our knowledge, there has been little research about predictive factors for surgical outcomes in patients with painful varicocele [2]. We have carefully read the article published in the World Journal of Men's Health by Park et al [3], and the findings are indeed interesting. This article, a meta-analysis of 14 trials, addresses the relationship between varicocele characteristics and surgical methods and the pain resolution rate following varicocelectomy. Patients with varicocele preoperatively complaining of dull pain demonstrated a higher likelihood of postoperative pain resolution than those complaining of excruciating or sharp pain [3]. These results may help in choosing a proper treatment method for patients with painful varicocele.

Similar to the authors above, we are working on ways to determine predictive factors for surgical outcomes in patients with painful varicocele. During microscopic varicocelectomy, we measure the diameter of the ligated spermatic vessels using vascular caliber meter. In our experience, patients with spermatic veins larger than 5 mm had successful surgical outcomes in terms of pain resolution.

Furthermore, ultrasonography is currently the most widely used imaging technique for the assessment of varicocele [4]. Therefore, in our opinion, both vein diameter and grade of reflux measured by the ultrasonography before surgery can be predictive factors for surgical outcomes in patients with painful varicocele. However, a large and randomized prospective study is required to confirm these findings.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have nothing to disclose.

Author Contribution:
  • Conceptualization: YSS.
  • Data curation: NA.
  • Formal analysis: NA.
  • Funding acquisition: NA.
  • Investigation: YSS.
  • Methodology: YSS.
  • Project administration: NA.
  • Resources: NA.
  • Software: NA.
  • Supervision: DSL.
  • Validation: NA.
  • Visualization: NA.
  • Writing—original draft: YSS.
  • Writing—review & editing: DSL.

References

  • 1.Park HJ, Lee SS, Park NC. Predictors of pain resolution after varicocelectomy for painful varicocele. Asian J Androl. 2011;13:754–758. doi: 10.1038/aja.2010.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Paick S, Choi WS. Varicocele and testicular pain: a review. World J Mens Health. 2019;37:4–11. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.170010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Park JH, Pak K, Park NC, Park HJ. How can we predict a successful outcome after varicocelectomy in painful varicocele patients? An updated meta-analysis. World J Mens Health. 2021;39:645–653. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.190112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lorenc T, Krupniewski L, Palczewski P, Gołębiowski M. The value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of varicocele. J Ultrason. 2016;16:359–370. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2016.0036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The World Journal of Men's Health are provided here courtesy of Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology

RESOURCES