Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 15;4(9):e2124511. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24511

Table 5. Association of Talking to Customers About Risk With State Medicalization Score and Statewide Adult Usea.

Risk State medicalization score (per 10-point increment) Statewide adult use
B (SE) P value B (SE) P value
Cannabis use disorder/addiction 0.003 (0.04) .95 −0.2 (0.13) .12
Motor vehicle collisions/safe driving 0.02 (0.05) .61 0.04 (0.15) .80
Cannabis withdrawal symptoms −0.04 (0.04) .34 −0.21 (0.13) .10
Psychotic reaction 0.03 (0.06) .51 −0.02 (0.07) .79
Cannabis medication interactions 0.08 (0.05) .09 −0.16 (0.15) .3
Potential cannabis adverse effects (eg, sleepiness, paranoia) 0.01 (0.04) .75 −0.17 (0.13) .18
Safe storage away from children and pets 0.04 (0.04) .36 0.3 (0.13) .03
a

This table presents a series of linear regression models in which each row represents the dependent variable with each column representing an independent variable in separate linear regression models. For example, the top-left-hand cell indicates that a 10-point increase in the state medicalization score is associated with a mean change of 0.003 in the scale response to how often the respondent talks to their customers about the risks of cannabis use disorder/addiction.