Table 5. Association of Talking to Customers About Risk With State Medicalization Score and Statewide Adult Usea.
Risk | State medicalization score (per 10-point increment) | Statewide adult use | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
B (SE) | P value | B (SE) | P value | |
Cannabis use disorder/addiction | 0.003 (0.04) | .95 | −0.2 (0.13) | .12 |
Motor vehicle collisions/safe driving | 0.02 (0.05) | .61 | 0.04 (0.15) | .80 |
Cannabis withdrawal symptoms | −0.04 (0.04) | .34 | −0.21 (0.13) | .10 |
Psychotic reaction | 0.03 (0.06) | .51 | −0.02 (0.07) | .79 |
Cannabis medication interactions | 0.08 (0.05) | .09 | −0.16 (0.15) | .3 |
Potential cannabis adverse effects (eg, sleepiness, paranoia) | 0.01 (0.04) | .75 | −0.17 (0.13) | .18 |
Safe storage away from children and pets | 0.04 (0.04) | .36 | 0.3 (0.13) | .03 |
This table presents a series of linear regression models in which each row represents the dependent variable with each column representing an independent variable in separate linear regression models. For example, the top-left-hand cell indicates that a 10-point increase in the state medicalization score is associated with a mean change of 0.003 in the scale response to how often the respondent talks to their customers about the risks of cannabis use disorder/addiction.