Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 30;6(36):23460–23474. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c03470

Table 2. Linear Regression Range, LOD and LOQ, Recovery, and Precision of the Developed HPLC-PDA Method at Different Concentrations of Picrocrocin, trans-4-GG-Crocin, trans-3-Gg-Crocin, cis-4-GG-Crocin, trans-2-gg-Crocin, trans-Crocetin, and Safranal in HPLC-PDA Single-Laboratory-Based Validation.

analyte Rt wavelength (mm) range (μg/mL) linear regression equationa R2 LOD (μg/mL) LOQ (μg/mL) average recoveryb (±SD) intermediate precision (%, RSD)
picrocrocin 7.435 250 0.78–100 y = 15392x – 955.9 1.000 0.178 0.844 90.36 ± 0.55 0.684
trans-4-GG-crocin 8.555 440 0.78–100 y = 58363x + 20042 0.999 0.277 0.839 82.49 ± 2.48 0.506
trans-3-Gg-crocin 8.971 440 0.31–40 y = 82239x – 658.89 0.999 0.095 0.288 86.55 ± 2.15 1.674
cis-4-GG-crocin 9.783 440 3.12–400 y = 925.81x + 2302 0.999 0.978 2.964 88.65 ± 1.95 0.544
trans-2-gg-crocin 10.261 440 3.12–400 y = 1799.9x – 295.52 0.999 0.877 2.659 90.78 ± 2.15 0.525
trans-crocetin 13.419 440 0.16–20 y = 73529x – 2315.7 1.000 0.048 0.146 90.96 ± 2.63 0.577
safranal 14.059 320 0.16–20 y = 33447x + 271.5 1.000 0.040 0.122 92.96 ± 0.91 0.557
a

Linear regression replications (n = 8 × 5).

b

% recovery (n = 3 × 3) and precision (n = 6 × 3).