Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 16;21:133. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00664-7

Table 2.

Comparison of quantitative parameters of [18F]FDG using different reconstruction algorithms for malignant tumor lesions (Kruskal–Wallis H test)

Reconstruction algorithms Quantitative parameters (Median P25, P75)
SUVmax SUVmean SBR MTV TLG
OSEM 8.07 4.75 4.36 5.15 23.86
(5.37, 11.39) (3.04, 7.18) (2.79, 6.43) (3.03, 12.48) (11.17, 70.64)
OSEM + TOF 8.38 5.01 4.65 4.86 25.97
(6.08, 12.08) (3.51, 7.53) (3.23, 6.76) (2.57, 12.54) (11.35, 74.00)
OSEM + TOF + PSF 9.01 5.39 5.2 4.31 23.62
(6.85, 12.67) (3.97, 7.73) (3.74, 7.31) (2.21, 11.05) (10.06, 73.92)
BPL 11.75 7.42 6.68 3.08 22.59
(9.97, 16.82) (5.83, 10.56) (5.19, 8.94) (1.13, 9.66) (7.02, 79.95)
X2 38.78 38.21 33.62 12.26 0.72
p value  < 0.001  < 0.001  < 0.001 0.005 0.868