Table 3.

The effect of the intervention program on with the change of HbA1_c with hierarchical regression analysis

Model	Factors	Unstandardized coefficients		Standardized Coefficients	p-Value#	95.0% CI for b
		b	SE	β		LB	UB
1	(Constant)	.056	.096		0.562	−.135	.247
	Intervention	−.372	.135	−.304	0.007*	−.640	−.104
2	(Constant)	−.009	.239		.969	−.486	.467
	Intervention	−.481	.148	−.394	.002*	−.776	−.187
	▵ Mindfulness	.036	.015	.629	.018*	.007	.066
	▵ Acceptance	.028	.015	.447	.077	−.003	.059
	Stress	.074	.107	.078	.488	−.139	.288
3	(Constant)	.371	.625		.554	−.875	1.618
	Intervention	−.605	.190	−.494	.002*	−.983	−.226
	▵ Mindfulness	.040	.017	.695	.020*	.007	.074
	▵ Acceptance	.029	.017	.475	.083	−.004	.063
	Stress	.069	.112	.073	.541	−.155	.294
	Occupation	.103	.168	.081	.544	−.233	.439
	Exercise	−.104	.188	−.066	.582	−.480	.271
	BMI	.081	.153	.065	.596	−.223	.386

^#Multiple linear regression, *statistically significant p < 0.05, R ² (Model 1) = 0.092, R ² (Model 2) = 0.167, R ² (Model 3) = 0.188, ê difference in difference.