Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 20;4(3):180–192. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12169

TABLE A2.

Nonconsensus barrier statements

TDF Barrier statements Minimum Median Maximum IQR
Physician‐related
Knowledge Lack of awareness of medication cost Low (15%) Moderately (45%) Very (15%) 2
Lack of formal education on prescribing for and treatment of the elderly Low (5%) Moderately (40%) Very (35%) 1.5
Skills Limited applicability of research findings in day‐to‐day clinical work Slightly (10%) Moderately (30%) Extremely (10%) 1.5
Social/professional role and identity Physicians imposing their own beliefs onto the patient without consideration for the latter (no shared decision making) Low (5%) Moderately (50%) Extremely (5%) 1.5
Dilemma between economic responsibility for both patients and society Low (30%) Neutral (45%) Very (10%) 2
Unwillingness to change recommendations from secondary/tertiary care Not at all (5%) Moderately (35%) Extremely (5%) 2
Varying acceptance of pharmacists’ recommendation Not at all (5%) Neutral (40%) Very (10%) 1.5
Beliefs about consequences *Fear of “giving up on the patient” Low (11%) Moderately (47%) Extremely (5%) 2
Viewing the deprescribing process as a risk to be avoided Low (15%) Neutral (25%) Very (10%) 2
Memory, attention, and decision‐making processes Feeling forced to prescribe Low (20%) Slightly & Neutral (30%), (25%) Moderately (25%) 1.5
Environmental context and resources Increased risk of ADRs and drug–drug interactions Low (5%) Moderately (25%) Very (30%) 3
Difficulty in distinguishing between new complaints and medication side effects Low (10%) Moderately (45%) Very (30%) 1.5
Pressure from guidelines vs individual patient circumstances Low (20%) Moderately (50%) Very (15%) 2
Uncertainty about patients who may be eligible for a medication review Low (15%) Neutral (25%) Very (15%) 2
Physicians themselves may be influenced by pharmaceutical drug representatives Not at all (5%) Neutral (35%) Moderately (25%) 2.5
Lack of access to a pharmacist (to assist with medication review) Not at all (10%) Neutral (25%) Very (5%) 3
Lack of available tools/strategies to help quantify benefits and harms Slightly (10%) Moderately (40%) Extremely (15%) 2
Social influences Culture to prescribe more Not at all (5%) Neutral (25%) Extremely (5%) 2
Lack of peer support (ie, medication review) Low (25%) Neutral (30%) Moderately (35%) 2.5
Peer influence Not at all (5%) Neutral (45%) Very (10%) 1.5
Emotion Choosing to maintain the patient–doctor relationship rather than enforce changes or recommendations and threatening that relationship Not at all (5%) Neutral & Moderately (20%), (50%) Moderately (50%) 2.5
Patient‐related
Environmental context and resources Unintentional withholding of ADRs because they attribute these to aging rather than side effects of medications Not at all (10%) Neutral (20%) Moderately (35%) 2
Patients are more likely to report symptoms to hospital specialists rather than GPs Not at all (5%) Neutral (40%) Very (10%) 1.5
Some patients “love taking medications” Low (10%) Moderately (50%) Very (15%) 1.5
Healthcare system–related
Environmental context and resources Data lost in the transition from written notes to electronic prescriptions Low (5%) Moderately (50%) Very (10%) 1.5
Influences of prescribing policy (perception of managerial meddling and cost cutting) Not at all (5%) Neutral (45%) Very (5%) 2
Limited options on healthcare organization formularies Not at all (10%) Low (45%) Moderately (5%) 2
Lack of data for outcomes most important to patients (eg, improvement in pain control Low (10%) Moderately (55%) Extremely (5%) 1.5
Difficulty in managing direct‐to‐consumer commercials about drugs and their impact on patients Low (25%) Neutral (65%) Moderately (5%) 1.5
*

Only 19 responses for this statement due to missing data.