Table 5. Analysis of variance (ANOVA).
(A) ANOVA test between different substrate types (Claystones, Sandstones and Limestones). (B) Tukey’s HSD (honestly significant difference) test for pairwise comparisons. (C) ANOVA test between different palaeodepth parameters (Near shore, Shallow-marine, Mid-ramp and Offshore). (D) Tukey’s HSD (honestly significant difference) test for pairwise comparisons.
| a | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | SS | df | MS | |
| Between-treatments | 96 | 2 | 48 | F= 8.57872 |
| Within-treatments | 335.7143 | 60 | 5.5952 | |
| Total | 431.7143 | 62 | ||
| b | ||||
| Pairwise comparisons | HSD.05= 1.7543 HSD.01= 2.2104 | Q.05= 3.3987 Q.01= 4.2822 | ||
| Claystones: Sandstones | M1 = 0.90 M2 = 0.33 | 0.57 | Q = 1.11 (p= .71491) | |
| Claystones: Limestones | M1 = 0.90 M3 = 3.19 | 2.29 | Q = 4.43 (p= .00748) | |
| Sandstones: Limestones | M2 = 0.33 M3 = 3.19 | 2.86 | Q = 5.54 (p= .00068) | |
| c | ||||
| Source of variation | SS | df | MS | |
| Between-treatments | 28.9 | 3 | 9.6333 | F= 3.32335 |
| Within-treatments | 220.3 | 76 | 2.8987 | |
| Total | 249.2 | 79 | ||
| d | ||||
| Pairwise Comparisons | HSD.05= 1.4143 HSD.01= 1.7333 | Q.05= 3.7149 Q.01= 4.5530 | ||
| T1:T2 | M1= 0.35 | 1.65 | Q = 4.33 (p= .01563) | |
| M2= 2.00 | ||||
| T1:T3 | M1= 0.35 | 0.5 | Q = 1.31 (p= .78958) | |
| M3= 0.85 | ||||
| T1:T4 | M1= 0.35 | 0.85 | Q = 2.23 (p= .39675) | |
| M4= 1.20 | ||||
| T2:T3 | M2= 2.00 | 1.15 | Q = 3.02 (p= .15112) | |
| M3= 0.85 | ||||
| T2:T4 | M2= 2.00 | 0.8 | Q = 2.10 (p= .45097) | |
| M4= 1.20 | ||||
| T3:T4 | M3= 0.85 | 0.35 | Q = 0.92 (p= .91521) | |
| M4= 1.20 | ||||