Skip to main content
. 2021 May 4;28(36):50052–50062. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14144-6

Table 2.

Average concentrations of selected micropollutants in wastewater before/after conventional treatment in the aeration tank followed by ozonation as well as in the hydroponic system Line B operated in flow-through mode in 2017

Target compound ACE CAF CBZ DIC IBU SMX ASMX BTZ MBT
Conventional treatment
Effluent grit chamber 14.1 110 1.56 7.09 19.0 0.59 1.56 13.1 1.42
Effluent secondary settling tank 0.76 0.09 1.52 3.20 < MQL 0.23 0.30 5.35 0.84
Removal [%] 95 100 3 55 100 57 81 59 41
Ozonation
Effluent ozone reactor 0.35 0.06 0.13 0.21 < MQL 0.07 0.10 2.23 0.23
Removal [%] 98 100 92 97 100 88 94 83 84
Hydroponic system, Line B: reclaimed water from ozone reactor
Influent 0.37 0.11 0.02 0.17 < MQL 0.10 0.12 1.99 0.20
Effluent 0.48 0.06 < MQL 0.09 < MQL 0.08 0.09 1.94 0.36
Lettuce shoots < MQL < MQL 12.2 < MQL < MQL < MQL < MQL < MQL < MQL
Lettuce roots 26.5 < MQL 12.4 12.2 < MQL < MQL < MQL < MQL < MQL

Concentration in wastewater, reclaimed water: μg L−1. Concentration in lettuce: μg kg−1 dry weight. MQL: method quantitation limit

ACE acesulfame, CAF caffeine, CBZ carbamazepine, DIC diclofenac, IBU ibuprofen, SMX sulfamethoxazole, ASMX acetyl-sulfamethoxazole, BTZ 1H-benzotriazole, MBT 4/5-methylbenzotriazole