Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 12;206(1):99–109. doi: 10.1111/cei.13638

TABLE 1.

Patient demographics

HNS HS COPD
Male/female, n 5/4 3/5 14/0
Age (years) 54 (34–67) 56 (29–76) 71 (59–80)**#
Current/ex‐smoker, n 0/0 8/0 5/9
Pack‐years n/a 22 (11–58) 60 (25–83.75###
Exacerbations in last year n/a 0.25 ± 0.7 1 ± 1.3
ICS (yes/no), n 0/9 0/8 12/2
SABA 0/9 0/8 13/1
LABA 0/9 0/8 12/2
LAMA 0/9 0/8 12/2
FEV1 (l) 3.1 ± 0.6 2.8 ± 1.2 1.6 ± 0.6**#
FEV1 (%) 101.9 ± 11.3 99.9 ± 13.9 56.3 ± 21.4***###
FVC (l) 4.1 ± 0.9 3.7 ± 1.4 3.3 ± 0.6
FEV1/FVC ratio (%) 75.4 ± 3.6 74.2 ± 6.4 46.7 ± 16.7***###
Reversibility (%) 0.6 ± 2.7 3.6 ± 6.3 11.4 ± 13.9
Sputum neutrophil (%) 52.3 ± 25.9 54.1 ± 17.2 76.0 ± 20.1*#
Sputum neutrophil cell count ×106/g 3.9 ± 3.9 3.3 ± 1.9 11.0 ± 11.0
Sputum macrophage (%) 29.6 ± 17.3 38.9 ± 12.4 16.7 ± 14.8#
Sputum macrophage cell count ×106/g 1.6 ± 1.1 1.9 ± 0.8 1.2 ± 0.5
Sputum eosinophils (%) 0.4 ± 0.4 0.9 ± 1.0 2.4 ± 3.5
Sputum eosinophils cell count ×106/g 0.0003 ± 0.0007 0.0001 ± 0.0004 0.0005 ± 0.001

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (range).

Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)% of predicted maximum, forced vital capacity (FEVC), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), long acting β‐agonists (LABA), long‐acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), short‐acting β‐agonists (SABA), reversibility % of FEV1 improvement following bronchodilator treatment.

Significant compared to HNS (*p < 0.05, **0.01, ***0.001); significant compared to HS (# p < 0.05, ##0.01, ###0.001).