Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 3;12:705441. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.705441

Table 2.

Pearson correlation testing between qualitative IgG indices and quantitative IgG and IgM titers using different methods (pooled data).

Ig Method IgG qualitative (ABBOTT) IgG quantitative 1 (AESKU) IgM quantitative 1 (AESKU) IgG quantitative 2 (ANSH) IgM quantitative 2 (ANSH)
IgG qualitative (ABBOTT) R 0.87 0.54 0.35 0.60
P value <.001* <.001* 0.019* <0.001*
IgG quantitative 1 (AESKU) R 0.87 0.41 0.42 0.38
P value <0.001* 0.003* 0.002* 0.006*
IgM quantitative 1 (AESKU) R 0.54 0.41 -0.07 0.79
P value <0.001* 0.003* 0.623 <0.001*
IgG quantitative 2 (ANSH) R 0.35 0.42 -0.07 0.09
P value 0.019* 0.002* 0.623 0.544
IgM quantitative 2 (ANSH) R 0.60 0.38 0.79 0.09
P value <0.001* 0.006* <0.001* 0.544

R, Pearson’s correlation coefficient; * statistically significant result (P < 0.05).

Bold values mean statistically significant P values.