Table 2.
OLS regression of outcomes on gender.
| Specification models | Dependent variables |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lost job permanently | Lost job temporarily | Log of expected income reduction | Increased weekly expenses | Increased savings | |
| Model 1 | 0.010* | −0.005 | 0.339*** | −0.055* | 0.065** |
| (0.006) | (0.011) | (0.129) | (0.030) | (0.027) | |
| Model 2 | 0.012** | 0.002 | 0.461*** | −0.063** | 0.062** |
| (0.006) | (0.011) | (0.128) | (0.030) | (0.027) | |
| Model 3 | 0.012** | 0.003 | 0.453*** | −0.066** | 0.060** |
| (0.006) | (0.011) | (0.129) | (0.030) | (0.027) | |
| Model 4 | 0.013** | 0.007 | 0.448*** | −0.065** | 0.053* |
| (0.006) | (0.011) | (0.129) | (0.030) | (0.027) | |
Note: This table reports the estimated coefficient on the female variable for different specification models that differ in the number of control variables. Model 1 only controls for country dummy variables. Model 2 adds to Model 1 demographic characteristics (age group, living alone, and urban areas). Model 3 adds to Model 2 income quintile of respondents. Model 4 adds to Model 3 the geographic region fixed-effects. The full regression results of Model 4 are reported in Table A.4 in Appendix A.
Robust standard errors in parentheses
*** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1