Table 8.
Performance evaluation on Caltech-101 dataset
Author | Year | Features | Technique used | Number of classes | Accuracy (%) | Time (min) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mahmood et al | 2017 | ResNet-152 | ResNet features with PCA-SVM classifier | 101 | 94.7 | |
Rashid et al | 2018 | VGG16, AlexNet and SIFT | Hybrid of Deep CNN and SIFT Features along with entropy-controlled selection method and ensemble boosted tree | 101 | 89.7 | 5.04 |
Singh et al | 2019 | Color Histogram (CH), Zernike Moments (ZMs), Gradient ZMs (GZMs), Multi-channel ZMs. (MZMs), Rotation Quaternion ZMs (RQZMs), | Fusion of these features with multi kernel learning (MKL) approach | 10 | 84.60 | 0.08 |
Our system | 2020 | SIFT, SURF, ORB, Shi Tomasi | Fusion of these features with eXtreme Gradient Boosting Classifier | 101 | 89.7 | 6.26 |
Proposed system | 2020 | VGG19, SIFT, SURF, ORB and Shi Tomasi corner detector | Fusion of these features with Random Forest Classifier | 101 | 93.73 | 0.39 |