Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 10;38:107354. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107354

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

Kruskal-Wallis and pairwise Tukey HSD testing in continuous parameters between study groups. A. Boxplot of age at diagnosis for all study groups. Overall Kruskal-Wallis analysis is P < 0.001. Tukey-HSD tests for pairwise comparisons indicate a significant result between PP-BCPW versus NP-BC (P < 0.001). No significant difference is found between PP-BCPW vs PP-BCDL (P = 0.949) and PP-BCPW vs Pr-BC (P = 0.217). B. Boxplot of year of diagnosis for all study groups. Overall Kruskal-Wallis analysis is P = 0.012. Tukey-HSD tests for pairwise comparisons indicate a significant result between PP-BCPW vs PP-BCDL (P = 0.025) and PP-BCPW vs Pr-BC (P = 0.026) and between PP-BCPW vs NP-BC (P = 0.061). C. Boxplot of tumour size at diagnosis for all study groups. Overall Kruskal-Wallis analysis is P = 0.804. Tukey-HSD tests for pairwise comparisons indicate no significant results between PP-BCPW vs PP-BCDL (P = 0.761), PP-BCPW vs Pr-BC (P = 0.761) and PP-BCPW vs NP-BC (P = 0.187).