Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD002310. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002310.pub4

Currie 2002.

Methods Setting: single centre study 
 Design: crossover study 
 Length of intervention period: 2 x 6 week treatment arms 
 Randomisation: Not described. 
 Allocation concealment: Not described 
 Masking: double blind 
 Excluded: Not stated 
 Withdrawals: Stated (non‐ITT) 
 Jadad score: 3
Participants N=20. (M/F: 8/12); Mean age: 38 (SEM 4); Mean ICS usage: 485mcg (78) for 13 participants, remaining 5 used SABA prn; FEV1 % predicted: 88.5 (SEM 2.5); am PEF (L/min): 443 (SEM 19); OUCC (nmol/mmol): 6.59 (SEM 0.7); Methacholine PD20 (mcg): 96.6 (SEM 22.1) 
 Inclusion criteria: FEV1 >70% predicted, PD20 <500mcg; SABA only or constant ICS dose up to 1200mcg 
 Exclusion criteria: history URTI; prior OCS usage
Interventions FP500 versus BDP500. Inhaler device: pMDI.
Outcomes FEV1 (% predicted); am PEF (L/min); OUCC (nmol/mmol); exhaled tidal NO (ppb); methacholine PD20; overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk Described as randomised; other information not available
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Information not available
Blinding? 
 All outcomes Low risk Identical inhaler devices