Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 17;25:339. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03759-3

Table 2.

Diagnostic accuracy of 6-zone lung ultrasound

Lung pattern LU/CT CT +  CT - Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) LR + (95% CI) LR—(95% CI)
Consolidation LU +  118 12 0.76 (0.68 to 0.82) 0.92 (0.87 to 0.96) 9.8 (5.6 to 17.0) 0.26 (0.20 to 0.35)
LU- 38 143
Interstitial syndrome LU +  48 24 0.60 (0.48 to 0.71) 0.69 (0.58 to 0.79) 2.0 (1.3 to 2.9) 0.58 (0.43 to 0.78)
LU- 32 54
Pneumothorax LU +  10 4 0.59 (0.33 to 0.82) 0.97 (0.93 to 0.99) 20.7 (7.3 to 58.9) 0.42 (0.24 to 0.75)
LU- 7 137
Pleural effusion LU +  94 10 0.85 (0.77 to 0.91) 0.77 (0.62 to 0.88) 3.7 (2.1 to 6.4) 0.19 (0.12 to 0.31)
LU- 16 33

Table depicting primary outcome, i.e., the diagnostic accuracy of a 6-zone lung ultrasound protocol. Two-by-two contingency Tables are displayed for consolidation, interstitial syndrome, pneumothorax and pleural effusion. A positive outcome for each outcome is denoted by a ‘ + ’, whereas a negative outcome is denoted by a ‘- ‘. Diagnostic accuracy parameters are estimated with their respective 95% confidence interval. LU: lung ultrasound; CT: computed tomography; CI: confidence interval; LR + : positive likelihood ratio; LR -: negative likelihood ratio