Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 17;22:189. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01538-1

Table 2.

Bivariate analysis of mastery of type 2 diabetes prevention and treatment knowledge in general practitioners

Influencing factor Number of subjects who failed [n (%)] Number of subjects who passed [n (%)] χ2 P
Sex 4.038 0.044
 Male 114 (51.82%) 106 (48.18%)
 Female 246 (43.85%) 315 (56.15%)
Educational level 27.23 0.000
 Associate’s degree or below 51 (73.91%) 18 (26.09%)
 Bachelor’s degree 278 (44.77%) 343 (55.23%)
 Master’s degree or above 31 (34.07%) 60 (65.93%)
Professional title 4.820 0.185
 None 10 (71.43%) 4 (28.57%)
 Junior 56 (44.80%) 69 (55.20%)
 Intermediate 253 (46.68%) 289 (53.32%)
 Vice-senior and above 41 (41.00%) 59 (59.00%)
Specialty 9.198 0.010
 Clinical medicine 304 (44.12%) 385 (55.88%)
 Traditional Chinese medicine practitioner 49 (61.25%) 31 (38.75%)
 Others 7 (58.33%) 5 (41.67%)
Position 4.365 0.113
 General practitioner 310 (46.90%) 351 (53.10%)
 General medicine team leader 38 (38.00%) 62 (62.00%)
 Others 12 (60.00%) 8 (40.00%)
Employment mode 1.801 0.406
 Formally employed 339 (45.56%) 405 (54.44%)
 Contract system 18 (56.25%) 14 (43.75%)
 Ex-retiree 3 (60.00%) 2 (40.00%)
Age 5.635 0.131
 < 35 years 78 (41.27%) 111 (58.73%)
 35–40 years 78 (45.88%) 92 (54.12%)
 40–45 years 97 (44.29%) 122 (55.71%)
 > 45 years 107 (52.71%) 96 (47.29%)
Years of work experience 3.490 0.175
 < 10 years 77 (40.31%) 114 (59.69%)
 10–20 years 144 (47.37%) 160 (52.63%)
 ≥ 20 years 139 (48.60%) 147 (51.40%)
Participated in standardized training? 0.001 0.978
 Yes 216 (46.06%) 253 (53.94%)
 No 144 (46.15%) 168 (53.85%)