Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 3;12:733899. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.733899

Table 1.

The number of vineyard environments, greenhouse (GH) timepoints, and laboratory (Lab) experiments with significant quantitative trait locus (QTL) for powdery mildew severity by tissue in B37-28 × C56-11.

Environments significant
Chra Minimum Interval (Mbp)a Leafb Rachisb Berryb Stemb Maximum variancec Resistance source
Validatedd
6 17.68–21.33 2 1 1 5.2% Eithere
8 0.47–11.99 3 29.8% B37-28
9 14.19–16.09 6 25.4% B37-28
15 13.06–15.16 11 11 11 7 96.2% B37-28
Not Validated
1 6.87–10.67 1 38.0% Either
1 6.87–9.70 Lab 27.9% Either
2 0.39–4.60 GH 37.7% C56-11
5 9.10–18.63 1 1 21.1% Either
6 0.50–2.03 1 31.5% Either
7 7.44–24.51 1 19.2% Either
10 0.42–2.60 1 13.4% Either
17 6.20–12.16 GH 39.1% Either

The bottom eight QTL were observed in only one environment and are considered not validated.

a

Physical position in the PN40024 12X.v2 reference genome for the narrowest QTL identified for any significant environment; all significant QTL that overlaps this region are reported in this line. Chr, chromosome.

b

Number of vineyard environments for which the QTL was significant for each tissue, with a maximum of 12 possible. Lab, controlled laboratory inoculation experiment; GH, natural inoculum greenhouse experiment with the early and late ratings.

c

The maximum phenotypic variance explained by a QTL at this locus for a single environment.

d

The top four QTL are considered validated because they were statistically significant in multiple independent environments.

e

Either = Significantly increased susceptibility at this locus required a specific haplotype contributed from each parent. While Chr 1 QTL overlap, these susceptibility effects were in repulsion, meaning the opposite haplotype combination was required for increased susceptibility in the vineyard vs. the lab.