TABLE 1.
Author | Type of study | Oral biofilm model | Type of prebiotic/probiotic | Groups (n) | Test method | Probiotics effects | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species composition | Antimicrobial activity | Immunology | ||||||
2005 | ||||||||
Kõll‐Klais et al26 | Screening of oral lactobacilli in chronic periodontitis and healthy patients and antimicrobial activity against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Streptococcus mutans, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans | P. gingivalis, P. intermedia, S. mutans, and A. actinomycetemcomitans grow in suspension | Several lactobacilli strains | Two groups: healthy (n = 15) and chronic periodontitis (n = 20) | Collection of saliva and subgingival samples, plated onto Man–Rogosa–Sharpe agar plates and incubated for 72 h at 37°C and 10% carbon dioxide. The isolated lactobacilli colonies were further analyzed by 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (RNA) gene sequencing | Lactobacillus gasseri and Lactobacillus fermentum were most prevalent lactobacilli identified in healthy patients, whereas Lactobacillus plantarum was the most prevalent strain in periodontal disease patients. Healthy patients exhibited higher counts of homofermentative strains than periodontitis patients did | The majority of probiotic strains significantly suppressed P. gingivalis, P. intermedia, S. mutans, and A. actinomycetemcomitans growth | — |
2010 | ||||||||
Zhu et al29 | Screening of bacteria isolated from yogurt for antimicrobial activity against pathogens | P. gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. intermedia, Prevotella nigrescens, Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, Porphyromonas circumdentaria, Bacteroides fragilis, and Streptococcus sanguinis grown on agar plates | Aliquots of yogurt containing Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Bifidobacterium strains | — | Antimicrobial effects based on inhibition zone diameter (in millimeters) on agar plates | — |
Aliquots of fresh yogurt significantly inhibited all the periodontal pathogens, whereas heat‐treated yogurt inhibited all the periodontal pathogens except F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis Fresh yogurt but not heat‐treated yogurt also inhibited the commensal bacteria S. sanguinis Probiotic antimicrobial activity varied depending on the sequence of inoculation (probiotics inoculated first, co‐inoculated, or last) |
— |
2012 | ||||||||
Zhao et al 53 | Evaluation of the effect of L. acidophilus on secretion of interleukins by gingival epithelial cells exposed to P. gingivalis | Gingival epithelial cells + P. gingivalis | L. acidophilus | Four groups: control (gingival cells); gingival cells + P. gingivalis; gingival cells + L. acidophilus; gingival cells + P. gingivalis + L. acidophilus | RNA and protein levels for interleukin (IL)‐1β, IL‐6, and IL‐8 at 2, 6, and 24 h after bacterial inoculation measured by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay | — | — | Probiotic significantly decreased IL‐1β, IL‐6, and IL‐8 levels in a dose‐dependent manner at all time points |
Bosch et al85 | Screening of acid lactic bacterial strains from healthy children (up to 10 y old) for probiotic candidates | P. gingivalis, F. nucleatum, Treponema denticola, Prevotella denticola and S. mutans grown on agar plates and tested for response to probiotics | Lactic acid bacteria | — | Antimicrobial effects based on inhibition zone diameter (in millimeters) on agar plates | — |
From 46 lactic acid bacteria initially screened, 32 inhibited P. denticola, 29 inhibited S. mutans, 24 inhibited F. nucleatum, 24 inhibited T. denticola, and only seven inhibited P. gingivalis From 46 lactic acid bacteria, none were able to inhibit all five pathogenic strains, and 11 strains were able to inhibit four out of the five pathogenic strains |
— |
Chen et al86 | Inhibition of periodontal pathogens by both L. fermentum and Lactobacillus salivarius and by their conditioned broth | S. mutans, S. sanguinis, and P. gingivalis grown on agar plates | L. fermentum and L. salivarius | — | Antimicrobial effects based on inhibition zone diameter (in millimeters) on agar plates and the broth was evaluated by counting the number of bacterial colonies on agar plates after broth treatment | — | Both bacterial strains and their broth exhibited significant inhibition of periodontal pathogens; however, the broth presented a lower inhibition effect than the bacterial strains did | — |
2013 | ||||||||
Saha et al87 | Development and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulose oral thin films for probiotic delivery | — | L. fermentum | — | — | — | L. fermentum remained viable in the oral thin film for 142 d and its antioxidant activity was maintained for 150 d, peaking at 48 h | — |
2015 | ||||||||
Terai et al26 | Screening of acid‐producing bacterial strains isolated from healthy patients for probiotic candidates | P. gingivalis, P. intermedia, A. actinomycetemcomitans, S. mutans, and Streptococcus sobrinus grown on agar plates | 14 lactobacilli and 36 streptococci strains isolated from 32 healthy patients | — | 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing was used for bacterial identification; antimicrobial effects based on inhibition zone diameter (in millimeters) on agar plates; cariogenic potential was measured by demineralization of bovine tooth enamel; experimental endocarditis infection was assessed in rats by in vivo heart infection with the pathogenic bacteria | — | Isolated Lactobacillus crispatus YIT 12319, L. fermentum YIT 12320, L. gasseri YIT 12321, and Streptococcus mitis YIT 12322 showed no cariogenic potential | Isolated L. crispatus YIT 12319, L. fermentum YIT 12320, L. gasseri YIT 12321, and S. mitis YIT 12322 showed low endocarditis potential |
2016 | ||||||||
Amižic et al88 | Screening of probiotic toothpaste and mouthrinse for antimicrobial effects | Candida albicans, C tropicalis, E faecalis, S. salivarius, and S aureus grown on agar plates | L paracasei or L acidophillus | 12 groups: saline; control toothpaste (no probiotic); L paracasei toothpaste; L acidophilus toothpaste; mouthrinse 1; mouthrinse 2; and the combinations of the three toothpastes with the two mouthrinses | Antimicrobial effects based on inhibition zone diameter (in millimeters) on agar plates | — |
Probiotic toothpaste significantly inhibited C. albicans and S. salivarius compared to the toothpaste without probiotics and all the mouthrinses With some exceptions, the combinations of probiotic toothpaste and mouth rinses were not significantly different from probiotic toothpaste alone |
‐ |
2018 | ||||||||
Slomka et al47 | Screening of prebiotic substrates to modulate pathogens/beneficial bacteria in oral biofilm | Multispecies biofilm containing A. actinomycetemcomitans, F. nucleatum, P. gingivalis, P. intermedia, S. mutans, S. sobrinus as representative pathogens and Actinomyces naeslundii, Streptococcus gordonii, Actinomyces viscosus, S. mitis, Streptococcus oralis, S. salivarius, S. sanguinis, and Veillonella parvula as beneficial bacterial species | β‐Methyl‐d‐galactoside; N‐acetyl‐d‐mannosamine; l‐aspartic acid; succinic acid; lactitol, turanose, methionine‐proline, phenylalanine‐glutamic acid | — | Quantitative PCR used to measure bacterial levels at 3, 5, and 10 d | — | N‐Acetyl‐d‐mannosamine, succinic acid, and methionine‐proline prebiotics reduced pathogenic bacteria to <5% in the biofilm; N‐acetyl‐d‐mannosamine resulted in a dose‐dependent increase in the beneficial bacteria, reducing the pathogenic bacteria to 3% at the highest concentrations | — |
Yamada et al89 | Effect of probiotic metabolite on P. gingivalis infection | P. gingivalis infection of gingival epithelial cells (Epi‐4); P. gingivalis inoculation in mouse model | Metabolite generated by probiotic bacteria (10‐hydroxy‐cis‐12‐octadecenoic acid [HYA]) | Four groups: control, P. gingivalis, HYA, P. gingivalis + HYA | Barrier disruption was measured by quantification of desmosomes visualized by transmission electron microscopy | — | HYA significantly inhibited gingival epithelial barrier disruption induced by P. gingivalis | HYA significantly suppressed P. gingivalis E‐cadherin degradation and proinflammatory cytokines IL‐1β, tmor necrosis factor‐α, and IL‐6 in mouse gingival tissue |
Zupancic et al 23 | Probiotic incorporation into chitosan‐poly(ethylene‐oxide) nanofibers | A. actinomycetemcomitans grown on agar plates | Bacillus sp isolated from a healthy patient | Two groups: A. actinomycetemcomitans; A. actinomycetemcomitans + nanofibers | Antimicrobial effects based on inhibition zone diameter (in millimeters) on agar plates | — | Probiotic significantly inhibited pathogen growth | — |
2019 | ||||||||
Cornacchione et al30 | Identifying the different strains of L. delbrueckii, that inhibit and do not inhibit the growth of P. gingivalis | P. gingivalis grown on agar plates | L. delbrueckii isolated from commercial yogurt products | — | Inhibitory effects based on the inhibitory zone diameter (in millimeters) on agar plates | — | The STYM1 strain of L. delbrueckii inhibited the growth of P. gingivalis by producing inhibitory amounts of hydrogen peroxide | — |