Table 6.
Gene symbol (accession) | µ-g & FOS (−)/A1-g & FOS (−) | µ-g & FOS (+)/A1-g & FOS (−) | A1-g & FOS (+)/A1-g & FOS (−) |
---|---|---|---|
Glycolytic process | |||
Aldoa (P05064) | FC = 0.92, P = 6.1E−2 | * FC = 0.88, P = 7.7E−3 | FC = 1.02, P = 1.0E−1 |
Bpgm (P15327) | FC = 0.84, P = 6.6E−2 | * FC = 0.84, P = 6.9E−4 | FC = 1.05, P = 4.8E−1 |
Pfkm (P47857) | FC = 0.78, P = 2.4E−2 | * FC = 0.55, P = 3.0E−3 | FC = 0.92, P = 4.1E−1 |
Fatty acid beta-oxidation | |||
Acox1 (Q9R0H0) | FC = 2.26, P = 2.7E−2 | * FC = 3.70, P = 8.1E−3 | FC = 1.71, P = 3.8E−2 |
Etfa (Q99LC5) | FC = 1.13, P = 1.1E−2 | * FC = 1.17, P = 2.4E−3 | FC = 1.00, P = 9.6E−1 |
Etfb (Q9DCW4) | FC = 1.15, P = 1.5E−2 | * FC = 1.19, P = 3.5E−3 | FC = 1.01, P = 6.4E−1 |
Tricarboxylic acid cycle | |||
Aco1 (P28271) | * FC = 1.21, P = 5.9E−3 | FC = 1.21, P = 8.0E−2 | FC = 0.96, P = 3.7E−1 |
Idh2 (P54071) | * FC = 1.43, P = 8.5E−4 | * FC = 1.45, P = 3.2E−4 | FC = 0.98, P = 6.3E−1 |
Mdh1 (P14152) | FC = 1.05, P = 1.4E−1 | * FC = 1.09, P = 6.2E−3 | FC = 0.99, P = 8.0E−1 |
Ogdh (Q60597) | FC = 1.11, P = 3.1E−2 | * FC = 1.09, P = 7.3E−4 | FC = 1.01, P = 5.6E−1 |
Pdha1 (P35486) | * FC = 1.15, P = 5.2E−4 | FC = 1.16, P = 1.8E−2 | FC = 1.05, P = 3.6E−2 |
Suclg2 (Q9Z2I8) | FC = 1.36, P = 2.4E−2 | * FC = 1.63, P = 5.1E−3 | FC = 0.93, P = 5.5E−1 |
The protein abundance profiles of the groups exposed to µ-g with and without FOS ingestion and the group exposed to A1-g with FOS ingestion were individually compared with that of the group exposed to A1-g without FOS ingestion. The results for the proteins, which were categorized as the related factors to each metabolic process by DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 and significantly (p < 0.01) affected by µ-g exposure and/or FOS ingestion, in EDL muscles, are indicated. The fold change (FC) and p value (P) of each protein are depicted. *: the significant high- or low-abundance proteins.