Table 2.

Pearson correlations of behavioral and rs-FC outcomes, and CR proxy.

	CR	MoCA	FPT	30SC	8UG	SMN	aDMN–DAN	DMN–DAN
CR	1
MoCA	0.22b	1
FPT	0.18b	0.07	1
30SC	0.37a	0.12	0.21b	1
8UG	− 0.22b	− 0.17	− 0.24b	− 0.68a	1
SMN	0.01	0.02	− 0.02	0.11	0.08	1
aDMN–DAN	− 0.03	− 0.04	0.10	0.22b	− 0.13	0.08	1
DMN–DAN	− 0.08	0.10	0.17	0.21b	− 0.14	0.29a	0.76a	1

	CR	Δ MoCA	Δ FPT	Δ 30SC	Δ 8UG	Δ SMN	Δ aDMN–DAN	Δ DMN–DAN
CR	1
Δ MoCA	0.22b	1
Δ FPT	0.00	− 0.23b	1
Δ 30SC	0.12	− 0.09	0.01	1
Δ 8UG	− 0.11	− 0.07	− 0.01	− 0.40a	1
Δ SMN	0.02	0.09	− 0.02	− 0.07	− 0.21b	1
Δ aDMN–DAN	0.03	− 0.13	0.19	− 0.01	− 0.18	0.01	1
Δ DMN–DAN	0.08	0.03	0.18	0.05	− 0.07	0.22b	0.70a	1

Bold values suggest significant partial correlations after adjusting for age and sex.

∆-change time₂ − time₁, CR cognitive reserve, MoCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment test, FPT Five-Point Test, 8UG 8-Foot Up-and-Go score in seconds, 30SC 30-Second Chair Stand test score, SMN internetwork connectivity of the sensorimotor network, DAN–(a)DMN connectivity between the dorsal attention network and the (anterior) default mode network.

^aCorrelation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).

^bCorrelation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed).