Table 3. Comparison of result reporting schemes.
We evaluated three different reporting schemes. The single threshold scheme uses a single numerical threshold to determine whether a subject has a bacterial infection in the bacterial vs. non-bacterial model or a viral infection in the viral vs. non-viral model. This single threshold allows for all subjects to be classified. The Quartile scheme uses multiple thresholds to assign subjects into probability bands. The reported PPA and NPA values focus on the top and bottom quartiles, therefore representing 50% of the cohort. The equivocal zone model allows for a probability band in which no call can be made. The equivocal zone thresholds for bacterial vs. non-bacterial and viral vs. non-viral classification were selected to exclude no more than 15% of the cohort.
| Single Threshold | Quartiles | Equivocal Zone | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPA | NPA | % cohort | PPA | NPA | % cohort | PPA | NPA | % cohort | |
| Training Cohort-Bacterial vs. Non-Bacterial Model | 85.3 | 81.4 | 100 | 100 | 92.4 | 50 | 85.4 | 86.2 | 85 |
| Validation Cohort-Bacterial vs. Non-Bacterial Model | 79.1 | 81.0 | 100 | 94.0 | 90.1 | 50 | 83.2 | 83.1 | 88 |
| Training Cohort-Viral vs. Non-Viral Model | 85.9 | 86.0 | 100 | 96.7 | 98.3 | 50 | 84.5 | 92.3 | 85 |
| Validation Cohort-Viral vs. Non-Viral Model | 89.0 | 84.7 | 100 | 96.7 | 94.9 | 50 | 81.5 | 91.8 | 85 |