Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Oncol. 2021 Jul 24;60(10):1308–1316. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1953137

Table 1:

Characteristics of included studies.

Author Enrollment
Years
Design Stage
(TNM)
Groups N of
Patients
Male% Age2 RT
dose
(Gy)
CT regimen Interval
Period7
Treatment
Compliance%8
Washington Cohort Markovina et al. (2017) 2009-2012 P II cT3-4 N0-2 M0 Study 69 71 57.2 25 mFOLFOX-6 (4 cycles) 11-17 96.7
Control 69 67 56.6 45 5FU or capecitabine 6-8 100
Myerson et al. (2014) 2009-2012 P II (single arm) cT3-4 N0-2 M0-1 Study 76 71 56.43 25 mFOLFOX-6 (4 cycles) 11-17 56
Control
Polish Cohort Ciseł et al. (2019) 2008-2014 P III cT3-4 N0-2 Study 261 70 60 25 FOLFOX-4 (3 cycles) 12 NR
Control 254 67 60 50.4 5FU+Leucovorin plus Oxaliplatin (2 cycles)4 6 NR
Bujko et al. (2016) 2008-2014 P III cT3-4 N0-2 Study 261 70 60 25 FOLFOX-4 (3 cycles) 12 63
Control 254 67 60 50.4 5FU+Leucovorin plus Oxaliplatin (2 cycles)4 6 66
Bujko et al. (2013) 2008-2010 P III cT3-4 N0-2 Study 49 67 60 25 FOLFOX-4 (3 cycles) 12 73.5
Control 48 69 59 50.4 5FU+Leucovorin plus Oxaliplatin (2 cycles) 6 72.9
Iranian Cohort Aghili et al. (2020) 2016-2020 RCT cT3-4 N0-2 M0 Study 33 55 56 25 concurrent XELOX; Consolidative XELOX (3-4 cycles) 15-20 87.9
Control 27 63 53 50-50.4 concurrent Capecitabine; Consolidative XELOX (3-4 cycles) 15-20 81.8
Aghili et al. (2018) 2013-2015 P II (single arm) cT3-4 N0-2 M0 Study 33 73 61 25 concurrent XELOX; Consolidative XELOX (1 cycle) 7-9 87.9
Control
Baltimore Cohort Jia et al. (2019) 2017-2019 R cT2-4 N0-2 Study 26 77 52 25 mFOLFOX-6 (25 patients), CapeOX (1 patient)5 14.5 81
Control
Danish Cohort Van Dijk et al. (2013) 2006-2010 P II (single arm) cT2-4 N0-2 M1 Study 50 54 59 25 CapeOX-Bevacizumab (6 cycles) 26 84
Control
RAPIDO trial Bahadoer et al. (2020) 2011-2016 P III cT2-4 N0-2 M0 Study 462 65 62 25 CapeOX (6 cycles) or FOLFOX4 (9 cycles)6 24 85
Control 450 69 62 50.4 or 50* Capecitabine 6-10 90
Indian Cohort Thakur et al. (2020) 1 2015-2016 Prospective NR Study 14 NR NR 25 CapeOX (2 cycles) 11-13 100
Control 13 NR NR 45 Capecitabine 4-6 87

(RCT = randomized clinical trial; P II/III = phase II/III; R = retrospective cohort, Pr = prospective cohort, N = number, NR = not reported, RT = radiotherapy; CT = chemotherapy; FOLFOX = fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin; 5FU = fluorouracil; XELOX/CapeOX = capecitabine and oxaliplatin)

1

Specific data on CRC stages, Male% and Age were not reported (NR) by Thakur et al., however, the authors state that the study and control groups were comparable in these regards.

2

Median Age reported in years.

3

Mean Age reported in years.

4

Oxaliplatin delivery left to local institution’s discretion after 2012.

5

Number of chemotherapy cycles were left at the treating physician’s discretion

6

Either chemotherapy regimen was used depending on the decision of the treating physician and hospital policy

7

Approximate intervals between completion of radiotherapy (SCRT or LCRT) and Surgery (in weeks)

8

Based on need for dose reduction and/or treatment delay due to toxicity or the proportion of patients completing the entire intended treatment