Table 1:
Characteristics of included studies.
Author | Enrollment Years |
Design | Stage (TNM) |
Groups | N of Patients |
Male% | Age2 | RT dose (Gy) |
CT regimen | Interval Period7 |
Treatment Compliance%8 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Washington Cohort | Markovina et al. (2017) | 2009-2012 | P II | cT3-4 N0-2 M0 | Study | 69 | 71 | 57.2 | 25 | mFOLFOX-6 (4 cycles) | 11-17 | 96.7 |
Control | 69 | 67 | 56.6 | 45 | 5FU or capecitabine | 6-8 | 100 | |||||
Myerson et al. (2014) | 2009-2012 | P II (single arm) | cT3-4 N0-2 M0-1 | Study | 76 | 71 | 56.43 | 25 | mFOLFOX-6 (4 cycles) | 11-17 | 56 | |
Control | ||||||||||||
Polish Cohort | Ciseł et al. (2019) | 2008-2014 | P III | cT3-4 N0-2 | Study | 261 | 70 | 60 | 25 | FOLFOX-4 (3 cycles) | 12 | NR |
Control | 254 | 67 | 60 | 50.4 | 5FU+Leucovorin plus Oxaliplatin (2 cycles)4 | 6 | NR | |||||
Bujko et al. (2016) | 2008-2014 | P III | cT3-4 N0-2 | Study | 261 | 70 | 60 | 25 | FOLFOX-4 (3 cycles) | 12 | 63 | |
Control | 254 | 67 | 60 | 50.4 | 5FU+Leucovorin plus Oxaliplatin (2 cycles)4 | 6 | 66 | |||||
Bujko et al. (2013) | 2008-2010 | P III | cT3-4 N0-2 | Study | 49 | 67 | 60 | 25 | FOLFOX-4 (3 cycles) | 12 | 73.5 | |
Control | 48 | 69 | 59 | 50.4 | 5FU+Leucovorin plus Oxaliplatin (2 cycles) | 6 | 72.9 | |||||
Iranian Cohort | Aghili et al. (2020) | 2016-2020 | RCT | cT3-4 N0-2 M0 | Study | 33 | 55 | 56 | 25 | concurrent XELOX; Consolidative XELOX (3-4 cycles) | 15-20 | 87.9 |
Control | 27 | 63 | 53 | 50-50.4 | concurrent Capecitabine; Consolidative XELOX (3-4 cycles) | 15-20 | 81.8 | |||||
Aghili et al. (2018) | 2013-2015 | P II (single arm) | cT3-4 N0-2 M0 | Study | 33 | 73 | 61 | 25 | concurrent XELOX; Consolidative XELOX (1 cycle) | 7-9 | 87.9 | |
Control | ||||||||||||
Baltimore Cohort | Jia et al. (2019) | 2017-2019 | R | cT2-4 N0-2 | Study | 26 | 77 | 52 | 25 | mFOLFOX-6 (25 patients), CapeOX (1 patient)5 | 14.5 | 81 |
Control | ||||||||||||
Danish Cohort | Van Dijk et al. (2013) | 2006-2010 | P II (single arm) | cT2-4 N0-2 M1 | Study | 50 | 54 | 59 | 25 | CapeOX-Bevacizumab (6 cycles) | 26 | 84 |
Control | ||||||||||||
RAPIDO trial | Bahadoer et al. (2020) | 2011-2016 | P III | cT2-4 N0-2 M0 | Study | 462 | 65 | 62 | 25 | CapeOX (6 cycles) or FOLFOX4 (9 cycles)6 | 24 | 85 |
Control | 450 | 69 | 62 | 50.4 or 50* | Capecitabine | 6-10 | 90 | |||||
Indian Cohort | Thakur et al. (2020) 1 | 2015-2016 | Prospective | NR | Study | 14 | NR | NR | 25 | CapeOX (2 cycles) | 11-13 | 100 |
Control | 13 | NR | NR | 45 | Capecitabine | 4-6 | 87 |
(RCT = randomized clinical trial; P II/III = phase II/III; R = retrospective cohort, Pr = prospective cohort, N = number, NR = not reported, RT = radiotherapy; CT = chemotherapy; FOLFOX = fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin; 5FU = fluorouracil; XELOX/CapeOX = capecitabine and oxaliplatin)
Specific data on CRC stages, Male% and Age were not reported (NR) by Thakur et al., however, the authors state that the study and control groups were comparable in these regards.
Median Age reported in years.
Mean Age reported in years.
Oxaliplatin delivery left to local institution’s discretion after 2012.
Number of chemotherapy cycles were left at the treating physician’s discretion
Either chemotherapy regimen was used depending on the decision of the treating physician and hospital policy
Approximate intervals between completion of radiotherapy (SCRT or LCRT) and Surgery (in weeks)
Based on need for dose reduction and/or treatment delay due to toxicity or the proportion of patients completing the entire intended treatment