Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 18;21:983. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07004-z

Table 3.

Characteristics of the included studies, outcome of the intervention and quality assessment result

Author (year) Country Methods Population Clinical setting Intervention Low-value practice Outcome of intervention(s) Quality assessment
Arora et al. (2020) [126] USA Evaluation of a quality improvement project 1535 children Emergency department Education, decision support, and performance feedback Head CT 4.6%-points reduction in use *
Ashykian et al. (2019) [37] USA Retrospective review 1000 reports Orthopedic and family practice departments Education Repeat radiographs for routine follow-up of osteoarthrosis 50% reduction in use *
Bailey et al. (2013) [38] USA Longitudinal data analysis 800 patients Emergency department Health information exchange Repeated lumbar or thoracic imaging 64% lower odds of repeat *
Bailey, Wan et al. (2013) [39] USA Longitudinal data analysis 1252 patients Emergency department Health information exchange Diagnostic neuroimaging 62% lower odds of repeat *
Bairstow et al. (2010) [40] Australia Pre/post audit 1061 patients Emergency department Education, request forms Chest CTA, abdominal XR, imaging with a provisional diagnosis of renal colic and XR despite negative Ottawa Ankle Rule 13–28% reduction in use *
Baker et al. (2020) [41] USA Retrospective registry review 445 patients Emergency department Education and guideline C-spine CT > 30% reduction in use *
Ballard et al. (2019) [127] USA Nonrandomized clinical trial - secondary analysis 3859 children Emergency department Electronic clinical decision support Head CT 2.6% unsignificant reduction in use *
Bhatia et al. (2013) [44] USA Prospective, time series analysis 1711 patients Academic medical center Education Transthoracic echocardiography 26% reduction in use
Bhatia et al. (2014) [42] USA Randomized Control Trial 88 internal medicine residents and 24 cardiology fellows Academic medical center Education Transthoracic echocardiography 62% reduction in use *
Bhatia et al. (2017) [43] Canada/USA Multicenter, randomized controlled trial 196 physicians 8 hospitals Education and feedback Transthoracic echocardiogram 1.3% significant reduction in use *
Blackmore et al. (2011) [45] USA retrospective cohort study 6141 patients Medical Center Decision support system Lumbar MRI, Brain MRI in headache, and sinus CT 23.2–26.8% significant lower use
Bookman et al. (2017) [46] USA Longitudinal, before/after study 235,858 patient visits 5 emergency departments Clinical decision support system Head/c-spine CT, Chest CTA

> 6% significant decrease in head and c-spine CT

2% non-significant reduction chest CTA

*
Boutis et al. (2013) [47] Canada Interrupted time series with pair matched control design. 2151 children 6 emergency departments Education, reminders, and computerized decision support system Ankle XR 22% reduction in use *
Breakell et al. (2018) [48] UK Retrospective audit 101 children District General Hospital Education and guideline Chest XR for Bronchiolitis 16% reduction in use
Buntine et al. (2018) [49] Australia Before and after study 2931 scans 3 hospitals Flowchart Chest CTA and NM ventilation perfusion 6 per 1000 scans reduction in use *
Carnevale et al. (2015) [128] USA Before-and-after study 29,395 encounters Emergency department Decision support and education Several 5–10% reduction in use *
Carpenter et al. (2020) [50] USA Retrospective chart review 1010 children Hospital Choosing Wisely CT/MR or US in cryptorchidism No significant difference *
Chandra et al. (2019) [51] Canada Evaluation of a quality improvement project 37 physicians Community teaching hospital Didactic seminar, Survey Imaging for low back pain 4%-points significant increase *
Chang et al. (2018) [52] USA Before-and-after study 202 family physicians and 8 general internists Clinics Feedback reports CT, MRI, and PET 14.5% reduction in use *
Char et al. (2014) [53] USA Retrospective chart review 510 patients Emergency department Increased D-dimer threshold value and clinical probability assessment Chest CTA 7%-points Increase in diagnostic yield
Chen et al. (2020) [54] USA Before-and-after study Physicians Hospital Alerts Imaging for lower back pain 9.6% reduction in total imaging rate and MRI (14.9%), No significant difference in use of CT/XR *
Chien et al. (2017) [55] USA Block randomized controlled trial 1205 clinicians Multidisciplinary medical group Financial incentives CT or MRI for single headache or lower back pain, acute, uncomplicated rhinosinusitis, or DEXA for low risk for osteoporosis No significant difference *
Depinet et al. (2016) [56] USA Interrupted time series trial 1886 children Urban tertiary care hospital Clinical decision support system and pathway Abdominopelvic CT/US 2%-points increased use of US and 5%-points reduction in use of CT *
Doyle et al. (2019) [57] USA Randomized study 3524 practitioners 15 hospitals and 150 clinics Best practice alerts Several 6% reduction in use
Drescher et al. (2011) [58] USA Before and after study 404 cases Emergency department Algorithm Chest CTA 4.4% increase in use *
Dudzinski et al. (2016) [59] USA Before and after study 65 cardiologists Ambulatory cardiology practices in hospital Education and feedback Transthoracic echocardiography 6%-points reduction in use *
Dunne et al. (2015) [60] UK Before and after study 5892 examinations Hospital Clinical decision support system Chest CTA 12.3% reduction in use *
Durand et al. (2013) [61] USA Randomized controlled trail 10 imaging tests Tertiary teaching hospital Cost display Several No significant difference *
Ehrlichman et al. (2017) [129] USA Before-and-after study 104,454 patients Emergency department Feedback Several 2.3% reduction *
Fallon et al. (2016) [62] USA Prospective, longitudinal study Children Level I pediatric trauma center Development of Trauma Protocol Abdominal CT for abdominal trauma 18%-points increase in diagnostic yield *
Ferguson et al. (2017) [63] USA Interventional improvement project 1 Emergency department Hospital Education and diagram Abdominal XR constipation 38%-points reduction *
Flamm et al. (2013) [64] Austria Non-randomized controlled trial with a historical control group 1363 patients Hospital PReOPerative evaluation’ (PROP) Chest XR 21.7%-points reduction
French et al. (2013) [65] Australia Cluster Randomized trail 112 general practitioners Practices Guideline/ facilitated interactive workshops Lumbar CT or XR No significant difference
Gertz et al. (2016) [66] USA Before-and-after study 941 patients Hospital Computerized order entry tool Cardiac stress tests with imaging No significant difference
Goldberg et al. (2011) [67] USA Retrospective cohort chart review 742 patients Hospital Guideline Head CT 16% reduction in use
Graves et al. (2018) [68] USA Interrupted time series 76,119 compensation claims Regional Policy implementation Imaging for lower back pain

5,6%-points significant decrease in use of MRI.

2.46% increase in the use of XR

No change in use of CT

Hardin et al. (2017) [69] USA Pre−/post-test design 339 patients Hospital Complex Care Map CT scans 62% reduction in use
Hess et al. (2018) [70] USA Cluster Randomized Trial 172 clinicians Emergency department Shared decision-making Head CT (children) No significant difference
Hong et al. (2017) [71] USA Retrospective chart review 1,547,870 patients Several Choosing wisely Imaging for lower back pain 4% reduction in use
Hoo et al. (2011) [72] USA Retrospective chart review 457 examinations Hospital Mandatory clinical decision rule and selective d-dimer use Chest CTA 13%-points Increase in diagnostic yield *
Hui et al. (2014) [73] USA Prospective cohort study and retrospective review 762 patients Hospital Education and guideline Pelvic US 58% reduction in use
Hurley et al. (2017) [74] USA Before-and-after study 10,554 patients Hospital MUSIC imitative Collaborative Bone scan and CT for prostate cancer 4.5–7%-points reduction in use *
Ip et al. (2013) [78] USA Before-and-after study 1.8 million patient-months Hospital Computerized order entry tool with clinical decision support systems and accountability tools Multiple 12% reduction in use *
Ip et al. (2014) [75] USA Retrospective cohort study 21,445 LBP-related primary care visits Academic quaternary care hospital Clinical decision support system Imaging for low back pain 30.8% reduction in use *
Ip et al. (2015) [77] USA Before-and-after study Emergency department patients Hospital Clinical decision support system Head CT 13.4% reduction in use *
Ip et al. (2017) [76] USA Before-and-after study 98,894 radiologyorders Four institutions Clinical decision support system Several 1%-point reduction in use
Jennings et al. (2017) [79] USA Evaluation of a quality improvement project 1346 Children Community emergency department Protocol, education, and individual feedback. CT head of children, minor head injury 12% reduction in use
Judkins et al. (2013) [80] Australia Retrospective chart review 659 children Tertiary children’s hospital NICE guidelines Ultrasound urinary system, MUCG and dimercaptocsuccinic acid scintigraphy 50% reduction in the use
Kandiah et al. (2020) [81] Canada Evaluation of a quality improvement project 4480 patients Hospital Education and information packages MRI and CT of joints without red flags

CT 43% reduction in use

MRI 0.6% reduction of use

*
Kanaan et al. (2013) [82] USA Retrospective chart review 200 patients Tertiary emergency department Education Chest CTA No significant difference *
Keveson et al. (2017) [83] USA Evaluation of a quality improvement project All invasive mechanical ventilator patients Tertiary hospital Education and change in routines/referral system Daily CXR of ventilated patients 64% reduction in use *
Kobes et al. (2020) [130] Canada Retrospective chart review 28 medical imaging sites Mobile radiography Guideline Chest XR 3.2% reduction in use *
Lacson et al. (2017) [84] USA Retrospective chart review 63,222 orders Hospital Clinical decision support system Several No significant difference
Levitt et al. (2015) [120] USA Before-and-after study 415 patients Hospital Decision support and education Stress echocardiography 12%-points reduction in use *
Lu et al. (2012) [85] USA Retrospective chart review 267 patients Hospital Importing images from other institutions into PACS Repeat imaging 61%-points reduction in use
Luther et al. (2019) [86] USA Retrospective chart review 273 patients Hospital Standardized clinical assessment and management plans Wrist XR 60% reduction in use *
Masood et al. (2020) [87] Canada Evaluation of a quality improvement project Parents in the emergency department Tertiary care center Education, guideline and checklist, patient handouts, and feedback Head CT in adults 7–14% reduction in use
McGrew et al. (2018) [88] USA Retrospective chart review 1934 children Pediatric Level 2 Trauma Center Guideline Head and abdomen/pelvis CT pediatric trauma 11.5–18.8% reduction in use
Mills et al. (2018) [121] USA Before-and-after study 7987 patients Emergency department Decision support Chest CTA 2.5% increased diagnostic yield *
Min et al. (2017) [89] Canada Retrospective chart review 4562 patients Emergency department Checklist Imaging in low back pain 22% reduction in use
Mittal et al. (2014) [91] USA Before and after design 3641 patients Tertiary care hospital Clinical practice guidelines Chest XR 14.6–20%-points reduction in use
Moriarity et al. (2015) [91] USA Retrospective chart review 33,311 patients Hospital Clinical decision support Inpatient MR, CT, and NM No significant difference
Mulders et al. (2020) [92] The Netherlands Before-and-after comparative prospective cohort study 1261 patients Emergency department Amsterdam Wrist Rules Wrist XR 15%-points reduction in use
Mäenpää et al. (2011) [93] Finland Retrospective, longitudinal study 1 regional hospital Hospital Regional Health InformationExchange Several 16.4% reduction in use *
Nigrovic et al. (2015) [94] USA Multifaceted quality improvement initiative Children < 21 years Urban tertiary care academic center Guideline development, feedback, and education Head CT 6%-points reduction in use *
O’Connor et al. (2014) [95] USA Prospective before and after study 28,420 CT orders Tertiaryacademic medical center Requiring a clinical justification to override a repeat CT alert Several Prevented 1 in 13 scans *
Ong et al. (2013) [122] USA Before-and-after study 471 patients Hospital Algorithm and guideline Chest CTA 26% reduction in use *
Ostby et al. (2020) [96] USA Evaluation of a quality improvement project 235 patients Emergency department Specialist consolation before imaging CT of gynecological cancer patients 54%-points reduction in use *
Palen et al. (2019) [97] USA Stepped-wedge study 31,426 orders several Check boxes Several Modest increase in appropriateness
Parikh et al. (2016) [98] USA Retrospective cohort study 220,539 patients Hospital Guideline Chest XR 6.4% significant reduction in use *
Poeran et al. (2019) [99] USA Retrospective interrupted time series 27,549 orders Emergency department Clinical decision support Low appropriateness imaging 9%-points reduction in use *
Prevedello et al. (2013) [100] USA retrospective cohort study 2891 patients Emergency department Alerts Chest CTA 2.2/1000 reduction in use *
Puffenbarger et al. (2019) [123] USA Retrospective chart review 556 visits Emergency department Education, guideline, and hand-outs Head CT 21.6%-points reduction in use *
Pugel et al. (2018) [101] USA Retrospective interrupted time series 213,532 consultations Ambulatory care Education, feedback and guidelines DEXA and head CT 23.4% reduction in use
Raja et al. (2012) [103] USA Retrospective cohort study 6838 patients Quaternary care institution Clinical decision support system Chest CTA 20.1% reduction in use *
Raja et al. (2015) [102] USA Prospective randomized controlled trial 2167 patients Urban level 1 adult trauma center Feedback Chest CTA 2/1000 reduction in use *
Reiter et al. (2018) [104] Israel Prospective cohort study 544 children Pediatric Emergency department Education, guideline cards at computers Chest XR for Bronchiolitis 20%-points reduction in use *
Rezaii et al. (2020) [105] USA Cohort study 27 practices, 4601 cases Academic and private practices Online educational material and feedback Chest CTA, advanced imaging of low back pain, follow-up of adnexal cysts 3% reduction in use *
Rosati et al. (2015) [106] USA Retrospective review 233 children Level I trauma center Guideline C-spine CT 23% reduction in use
Sclafani et al. (2010) [107] USA Retrospective chart review 1092 patients Hospital Education Head CT, brain MRI and carotid US of syncope patients No significant difference
Shah et al. (2016) [108] USA Chart review 824 children Emergency department Diagnostic algorithm Abdominal CT appendicitis 51.2%-points reduction in use
Shelton et al. (2015) [131] USA Before-and-after study 2001 patients Hospital Feedback Several 38% reduction in use *
Singer et al. (2014) [109] USA Before and after trial design 34,961 children Academic medical center Opening a dedicated pediatric ED Several 3.2% reduction in use
Sodickson et al. (2011) [110] USA Retrospective chart review 1487 patients Tertiary care, level I trauma center Health InformationExchange Several 16–18% reduction in use
Sy et al. (2016) [111] Canada Evaluation of a quality improvement project 1492 patients Intensive care unit Education, posters, and change in order system Chest XR 26% reduction in use *
Tajmir et al. (2017) [124] USA Randomized controlled trail 613 patients Hospital Decision support Ankle XR Modest change in diagnostic yield
Tyler et al. (2018) [112] USA Evaluation of a quality improvement project 2211 patients Children’s hospital Education, feedback, sign pledge, visualizing algorithm, guideline Chest XR 12.1%-points reduction in use
Vartanians et al. (2010) [113] USA Retrospective study 118,975 orders Several Change in ordering system Several 3.5%-points reduction in use *
Walen et al. (2016) [125] USA Prospective observational study 250 patients Hospital Wells-score documentation Chest CTA 6.6% increase in diagnostic yield
Walker et al. (2020) [114] Canada Retrospective chart review 302 Consultations Primary care Electronic communication system Abdominal, musculoskeletal, neuro, and thoracic imaging 28% reduction in use
Wang et al. (2018) [115] USA Retrospective chart review 3 clinics Primary care On-site and online education and feedback Lumbar MRI 3.7 MRIs reduced per month
Wu et al. (2020) [116] USA Evaluation of a quality improvement project 6441 Chest XRs Medical Intensive care unit Survey, journal club, discussions, posters, alerts in electronic referral system, education, pocket cards, electronic decision tool Chest XR 36.1% reduction in use
Xu et al. (2020) [117] Canada Retrospective review 400 referrals Tertiary care center Mandatory check list Knee MRI 48% reduction in use *
Zafar et al. (2019) [118] USA Randomized cohort study 54 providers Tertiary academic health system Algorithm and alerts Low back imaging No significant difference *
Zamora-Flores et al. (2015) [119] USA Retrospective chart review 322 children Rural community hospital Guideline Chest XR No significant difference

CT computed tomography, CTA CT angiography, DEXA dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, MMAT Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, MUCG micturating cystourethrogram, NM nuclear medicine, PET positron emission tomography, US ultrasound, XR X-ray

* Fulfill all MMAT criteria

Italic = Mixed results, Bold = Reduction in use/increase in rate of diagnostic yield, Normal = no significant difference/increase