Figure 2.

Aberrant expression of Ten-m impairs courtship-conditioning learning

(A) CIs of control males (elav-GAL4, UAS-Ten-m, UAS-Ten-m-RNAi, n = 10) and experimental males (elav > Ten-m and elav > Ten-m-RNAi, n = 10). Box-and-whisker plots of CIs show 10^th, 25^th, 50^th, 75^th, and 90^th centiles and means (short dashed line). N, naive; T, trained. Experimental males showed no difference in CIs between naive and trained groups, while the CIs of control males in the trained group were significantly lower than in the naive groups.

(B) LIs of control males (elav-GAL4, UAS-Ten-m, UAS-Ten-m-RNAi, n = 10) and experimental males (elav > Ten-m and elav > Ten-m-RNAi, n = 10). LIs were compared using the permutation test with 100,000 random permutations (one-tail, H1: LI _control > LI _{experimental males}). LIs of experimental males were significantly higher than those in control males.

The Mann-Whitney U test was used for CIs. ∗∗∗p < 0.001; n.s., no significance.