Table 5. Perceived importance of different services provided by mussels.
Results of multinomial logistic regressions assessing the influence of respondent profile on the perceived importance of different services provided by mussels (Q5) and their state in the last 10 years (Q6). Significant differences (p < 0.05) indicated in bold.
| Question & Answers | Respondent profile | Coefficients (p-values) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q5 Recreational activity | |||
| Somehow important | Visitor/Resident | Resident | −0.974 (0.229) |
| Coastal/Non-coastal | Coastal | 0.788 (0.329) | |
| The most important | Visitor/Resident | Resident | 0.024 (0.980) |
| Coastal/Non-coastal | Coastal | 2.695 (0.035) | |
| Very important | Reference | ||
| Statistical fit of the model | Intercept | Final | |
| −2 Log L | 32.248 | 19.915 | |
| Likelihood ratio test (p-value) | 12.333 (0.015) | ||
| Q5 Human food | |||
| The most important | Education | Basic | 1.149 (0.091) |
| Secondary | −0.201 (0.755) | ||
| University | Reference | ||
| Age | <40 | 1.132 (0.109) | |
| 40–55 | Reference | ||
| >55 | 2.243 (0.000) | ||
| Very important | Education | Basic | 0.973 (0.103) |
| Secondary | 0.277 (0.603) | ||
| University | Reference | ||
| Age | <40 | 0.233 (0.677) | |
| 40–55 | Reference | ||
| >55 | 1.268 (0.012) | ||
| Statistical fit of the model | Intercept | Final | |
| −2 Log L | 80.197 | 52.179 | |
| Likelihood ratio test (p-value) | 28.019 (0.000) | ||
| Q6 Recreational activity | |||
| Better | Visitor/Resident | Resident | 0.470 (0.700) |
| Do not know | Resident | −1.833 (0.007) | |
| Identical | Resident | −1.386 (0.064) | |
| Worse | Reference | ||
| Statistical fit of the model | Intercept | Final | |
| −2 Log L | 29.220 | 18.624 | |
| Likelihood ratio test (p-value) | 10.596 (0.014) | ||
| Q6 Purification of seawater | |||
| Better | Age | <40 | −0.981 (0.125) |
| 40–55 | Reference | ||
| >55 | −0.113 (0.843) | ||
| Do not know | <40 | −0.480 (0.368) | |
| 40–55 | Reference | ||
| >55 | −1.194 (0.028) | ||
| Worse | <40 | −0.211 (0.679) | |
| 40–55 | Reference | ||
| >55 | −0.824 (0.105) | ||
| Identical | Reference | ||
| Statistical fit of the model | Intercept | Final | |
| −2 Log L | 58.621 | 39.616 | |
| Likelihood ratio test (p-value) | 19.005 (0.004) | ||
| Q6 Food other species | |||
| Better | Age | <40 | −0.191 (0.757) |
| 40–55 | Reference | ||
| >55 | 1.153 (0.038) | ||
| Do not know | <40 | −0.191 (0.566) | |
| 40–55 | Reference | ||
| >55 | 0.092 (0.805) | ||
| Identical | <40 | −0.037 (0.935) | |
| 40–55 | Reference | ||
| >55 | 0.667 (0.146) | ||
| Worse | Reference | ||
| Statistical fit of the model | Intercept | Final | |
| −2 Log L | 47.531 | 38.119 | |
| Likelihood ratio test (p-value) | 9.413 (0.152) | ||
| Q6 Existential value | |||
| Better | Visitor/Resident | Resident | 17.909 (0.000) |
| Coastal/Non-coastal | Coastal | Not calculated | |
| Do not know | Resident | −0.693 (0.431) | |
| Coastal | −0.365 (0.639) | ||
| Identical | Resident | 1.386 (0.258) | |
| Coastal | 16.618 (0.995) | ||
| Worse | Reference | ||
| Statistical fit of the model | Intercept | Final | |
| −2 Log L | 41.001 | 19.559 | |
| Likelihood ratio test (p-value) | 21402 (0.002) | ||