Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Econ. 2021 Aug 2;79:102512. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102512

Appendix Table A1:

Reduced form estimates of the impact of the regime change on the fraction of NYS smokers who usually purchase premium-brand cigarettes: alternative specifications of time effects

NYS-ATS NHP-Full
Quadratic Time Trend Year Dummies Quadratic Time Trend Year Dummies
Post −0.1692*** −0. 1527*** −0.1328*** −0.1736***
(0. .0342) (0. 0465) (0.0455) (0.0465)
Distance −0.0643* −0.0648* −0.0367 −0.0384
(0.0367) (0.0364) (0.0884) (0.0886)
Post * Distance 0. 2070*** 0.2076*** 0.2758*** 0.2752***
(0.0421) (0.0423) (0.0636) (0.0639)
Cigarette Tax −0. 0087 0.0575* −0.0015 −0.0184**
(0.0088) (0.0669) (0.0117) (0.0086)
Wave 0.0024** −0.0064
(0.0011) (0.0051)
Wave * Wave 0.0000 0.0000
(0.0000) (0.0000)

R 2 0.1957 0.1959 0.2231 0.2245
Dependent Mean 0.714 0.714 0.6832 0.6832
Number of Households --- --- 2,024 2,024
Observations 9,732 9,732 24,297 24,297

Notes: All models also contain flexible controls race, gender, education, income, as well as region fixed effects. Standard errors appear in parenthesis; they are clustered at the county level in the NYS-ATS data and at the zip code level in the NHP data.

***

p<0.01,

**

p<0.05,

*

p<0.1