Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Econ. 2021 Aug 2;79:102512. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102512

Table 3.

Reduced form estimates of the impact of the regime change on the fraction of NYS smokers who purchase Native-produced cigarette brands.

Selected Regressors NYS-ATS NHP--Full NHP--Panel
Post (β1) 0.1962*** 0.1270*** 0.1190***
(0.0458) (0.0353) (0.0432)
Distance (β2) 0.0019 −0.0039 −0.0027
(0.0275) (0.0351) (0.0609)
Post* Distance (β3) −0.2572*** −0.2280*** −0.2110***
(0.0564) (0.0477) (0.0588)
Cigarette Tax 0.0003 −0.0202*** −0.0219***
(0.0068) (0.0062) (0.0090)
Wave 0.0028*** 0.0015*** 0.0018***
(0.0007) (0.0003) (0.0004)

R2 0.188 0.199 0.360
Dependent Mean 0.075 0.055
Sample Size (N) 9,732 24,297 10,783
Number of Households ---- 2,024 308

Notes: All models also contain flexible controls race, gender, education, and income, as well as region fixed effects. Standard errors appear in parenthesis; they are clustered at the county level in the NYS-ATS data and at the zip code level in the NHP data.

***

p<0.01,

**

p<0.05,

*

p<0.1.