Table 1.
monomers | coupling | oxidant | plant extracta | 8-5’ (μM)b | [%]c | 8-8’ (μM)b | [%]c | 8-8' regioisomeric content (%)d |
% eee |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CA-CA (2) | TvLac | EV | 250 ± 47 | [50] | 122 ± 26 | [24] | 33 | 2 |
PhDIR | 57 ± 10 | [11] | 446 ± 29 | [89] | 89 | 88 | |||
1 + 8 | CA-MCA (17) | TvLac | EV | 86 ± 11 | [17] | 33 ± 5 | [7] | 28 | 2 |
PhDIR | 55 ± 2 | [11] | 83 ± 3 | [17] | 60 | 91 | |||
MCA-MCA (26) | TvLac | EV | 62 ± 14 | [12] | 15 ± 5 | [3] | 19 | 0 | |
PhDIR | 41 ± 3 | [8] | 11 ± 2 | [2] | 21 | 31 | |||
1 + 10 | CA-FMCA (19) | TvLac | EV | 136 ± 19 | [27] | 24 ± 5 | [5] | 15 | 1 |
PhDIR | 10 ± 2 | [2] | 145 ± 4 | [29] | 94 | 94 | |||
FMCA-FMCA (28) | TvLac | EV | N/Af | 49 ± 8 | [10] | N/Af | −2 | ||
PhDIR | N/Af | 129 ± 3 | [26] | N/Af | 82 | ||||
1 + 11 | CA-ECA (20) | TvLac | EV | 182 ± 12 | [36] | <10g | [<2] | <5 | 0 |
PhDIR | 54 ± 11 | [11] | 88 ± 16 | [18] | 62 | 89 | |||
ECA-ECA (29) | TvLac | EV | 168 ± 11 | [34] | <10g | [<2] | <6 | −1 | |
PhDIR | 147 ± 23 | [29] | 20 ± 10 | [4] | 12 | 47 |
plant extracts obtained with APW from leaves expressing empty vector (EV) or PhDIR.
Reaction yield was estimated from a standard curve using EIC peak integration as analyzed by LC-MS on C18 chromatography. For 17 and 26, standard curves of 2b and 2c were used to estimate yields. Error values are standard deviations of triplicates.
100% theoretical yield corresponds to 500 μM product generated from coupling of 500 μM each substrate (1mM total substrate concentration).
8-8' regioisomeric content was calculated by the following formula: [8-8', b]/([8-8', b]+[8-5', c])*100%.
ee: enantiomeric excess of (+)-pinoresinol or analogue over (−)-pinoresinol or analogue, calculated using the EIC peak integration ratios on chiral chromatography.
Not applicable; 8-5’ coupling product was not observed with the fluorine substituent.
Below limit of linearity of 10 μM.