Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Jun 22;54(2):4528–4549. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15327

Table 2:

Comparison of linear and quadratic models using error as the predictor

Predictor b b 95% CI [LL, UL] beta beta 95% CI [LL, UL] Model Fit Difference between Models
WT Linear Model
Day Error −0.21** [−0.35, −0.06] −0.46 [−0.77, −0.14] R2 = 0.209**
95% CI[0.02,0.42]
Quadratic Model
Day Error −0.53* [−1.04, −0.01] −1.15 [−2.28, −0.02] R2 = 0.249* ΔR2 = 0.040
Day Error2 0.06 [−0.03, 0.16] 0.72 [−0.40, 1.85] 95% CI[0.02,0.44] 95% CI[−0.07, 0.15]

HET Linear Model
Day Error −1.34* [−2.53, −0.15] −0.37 [−0.70, −0.04] R2 = 0.138*
95% CI[0.00,0.35]
Quadratic Model
Day Error −6.32** [−10.27, −2.37] −1.75 [−2.84, −0.65] R2 = 0.295** ΔR2 = 0.157*
Day Error2 0.98* [0.23, 1.72] 1.43 [0.34, 2.52] 95% CI[0.04,0.48] 95% CI[−0.05, 0.36]

Note. b represents unstandardized regression weights. beta indicates the standardized regression weights. LL and UL indicate the lower and upper limits of a confidence interval, respectively.

*

indicates p < 0.05.

**

indicates p < 0.01.