Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 20;49(16):9077–9096. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab688

Table 5.

Comparison of mt-tRNA gene predictions with NCBI RefSeq annotations. About 73 674 annotated mt-tRNA genes in 3345 mitochondrial genomes from NCBI RefSeq (24) were used as references for comparison. ‘Consistent’ represents the count and percentage of predicted mt-tRNA genes that are the same or nearly the same as RefSeq annotations (may include up to a 15-nt difference in start and/or end positions). ‘Isotype mismatch’ represents the number and percentage of predicted mt-tRNA genes that have conflicting isotype classification. ‘Position mismatch’ represents the number and percentage of predicted mt-tRNA genes that had conflicting strand or start/end positions beyond ±15 nts. ‘Novel’ represents the predicted mt-tRNA genes that were not found in RefSeq annotations. ‘Not detected’ is the count of RefSeq annotations that were not detected by the prediction algorithm.

Prediction algorithm Predicted mt-tRNAs Consistent Isotype mismatch Position mismatch Novel Not detected
tRNAscan-SE 2.0 (vertebrate mito mode) 73 671 72 920 (99.0%) 35 (0.05%) 527 (0.7%) 189 (0.3%) 192
ARWEN 80 617 70 677 (87.7%) 211 (0.3%) 551 (0.7%) 9178(11.4%) 2235
MiTFi 73 685 72 796 (98.8%) 96 (0.1%) 528 (0.7%) 265 (0.4%) 254