Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 6;12:718915. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.718915

TABLE 4.

Comparison of P-values of survival analysis between MRF-MSC and other algorithms on five cancer multi-omics data sets in Rappoport and Shamir (2018).

Cancer type Methods
MRF-MSC iClusterPlus PFA SNF ANF MVSCO
GBM 1.43E-6 3.83E-3 7.69E-6 2.17E-1 6.59E-4
(k = 2) (k = 10) (k = 2) (k = 3) (k = 2)
BRCA 5.25E-13 1.55E-2 3.54E-9 4.38E-9 2.30E-11 4.26E-12
(k = 4) (k = 4) (k = 3) (k = 3) (k = 5) (k = 3)
KIRC 7.10E-6 2.10E-2 2.93E-3 2.53E-2 4.22E-3 2.71E-4
(k = 4) (k = 4) (k = 3) (k = 2) (k = 2) (k = 3)
LSCC 9.13E-4 4.63E-3 1.10E-1 9.45E-2 2.19E-2 1.37E-2
(k = 2) (k = 3) (k = 3) (k = 2) (k = 2) (k = 2)
COAD 2.63E-1 7.05E-1 3.21E-1 1.52E-1 7.68E-2 1.29E-1
(k = 3) (k = 2) (k = 2) (k = 3) (k = 3) (k = 2)

The best results have been highlighted in bold. –Denotes that the algorithm cannot get the clustering result on the data.