Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 20.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Aug 26;159(1):101–111. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.045

Table 1.

Baseline patient demographics, disease characteristics, and prior therapies according to age subgroup.

Age <65 years
Age 65–74 years
Age ≥75 years
Rucaparib
(n = 237)
Placebo
(n = 117)
Rucaparib
(n = 113)
Placebo
(n = 64)
Rucaparib
(n = 25)
Placebo
(n = 8)
Age, median (range) 56.0 (39.0–64.0) 55.0 (36.0–64.0) 68.0 (65.0–74.0) 69.0 (65.0–74.0) 76.0 (75.0–84.0) 77.5 (76.0–85.0)
ECOG performance status, n (%)
 0 189 (79.7) 88 (75.2) 77 (68.1) 44 (68.8) 14 (56.0) 4 (50.0)
 1 48 (20.3) 29 (24.8) 36 (31.9) 20 (31.3) 11 (44.0) 4 (50.0)
Diagnosis, n (%)
 Epithelial ovarian cancer 205 (86.5) 103 (88.0) 87 (77.0) 50 (78.1) 20 (80.0) 6 (75.0)
 Fallopian tube cancer 13 (5.5) 4 (3.4) 15 (13.3) 6 (9.4) 4 (16.0) 0
 Primary peritoneal cancer 19 (8.0) 10 (8.5) 11 (9.7) 7 (10.9) 1 (4.0) 2 (25.0)
 High-grade serous adenocarcinoma 0 0 0 1 (1.6)a 0 0
BRCA mutation in carcinoma, n (%)
BRCA mutant 96 (40.5) 49 (41.9) 29 (25.7) 15 (23.4) 5 (20.0) 2 (25.0)
  BRCA1 66 (27.8) 31 (26.5) 14 (12.4) 5 (7.8) 0 1 (12.5)
  BRCA2 30 (12.7) 18 (15.4) 15 (13.3) 10 (15.6) 5 (20.0) 1 (12.5)
  Germline 65 (27.4) 38 (32.5) 15 (13.3) 8 (12.5) 2 (8.0) 2 (25.0)
  Somatic 25 (10.5) 9 (7.7) 12 (10.6) 7 (10.9) 3 (12.0) 0
  BRCA unknownb 6 (2.5) 2 (1.7) 2 (1.8) 0 0 0
BRCA wild-type
  LOH high 67 (28.3) 29 (24.8) 35 (31.0) 21 (32.8) 4 (16.0) 2 (25.0)
  LOH low 57 (24.1) 29 (24.8) 40 (35.4) 22 (34.4) 10 (40.0) 3 (37.5)
  LOH indeterminatec 17 (7.2) 10 (8.5) 9 (8.0) 6 (9.4) 6 (24.0) 1 (12.5)
No. of prior chemotherapy regimens, median (range) 2.0 (2.0–6.0) 2.0 (2.0–5.0) 2.0 (2.0–6.0) 2.0 (2.0–6.0) 2.0 (2.0–5.0) 2.5 (2.0–4.0)
 2, n (%) 149 (62.9) 81 (69.2) 68 (60.2) 39 (60.9) 14 (56.0) 4 (50.0)
 3, n (%) 63 (26.6) 25 (21.4) 37 (32.7) 14 (21.9) 8 (32.0) 3 (37.5)
 ≥4, n (%) 25 (10.5) 11 (9.4) 8 (7.1) 11 (17.2) 3 (12.0) 1 (12.5)
No. of previous Pt-based regimens, median (range) 2.0 (2.0–5.0) 2.0 (2.0–4.0) 2.0 (2.0–6.0) 2.0 (2.0–5.0) 2.0 (2.0–4.0) 2.5 (2.0–4.0)
 2, n (%) 153 (64.6) 82 (70.1) 69 (61.1) 40 (62.5) 14 (56.0) 4 (50.0)
 ≥3, n (%) 84 (35.4) 35 (29.9) 44 (38.9) 24 (37.5) 11 (44.0) 4 (50.0)
TTP with penultimate Pt-based regimen, median (range) 13.6 (6.0–115.4) 16.9 (6.0–107.6) 14.2 (5.8–120.0) 12.3 (6.4–238.5) 10.7 (6.1–106.7) 13.3 (6.6–33.5)
 6 to ≤12, n (%) 96 (40.5) 38 (32.5) 42 (37.2) 34 (53.1) 13 (52.0) 4 (50.0)
 >12, n (%) 141 (59.5) 79 (67.5) 71 (62.8) 30 (46.9) 12 (48.0) 4 (50.0)
Response to last Pt-based regimen, n (%)
 CR according to RECIST 93 (39.2) 42 (35.9) 26 (23.0) 20 (31.3) 7 (28.0) 2 (25.0)
 PR according to RECIST or serologic response according to GCIG CA-125 criteria 144 (60.8) 75 (64.1) 87 (77.0) 44 (68.8) 18 (72.0) 6 (75.0)

CA-125, cancer antigen 125; CR, complete response; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; GCIG, Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup; HRR, homologous recombination repair; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; PR, partial response; Pt, platinum; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors; TTP, time to progression.

a

According to the patient's records, origin was fallopian tube or ovary.

b

Tumor sample was BRCA mutant according to Foundation Medicine's T5 next-generation sequencing assay, but a blood sample was not available for central germline testing.

c

Tumor sample was not evaluable for percentage of genomic LOH because of low tumor content or aneuploidy.